Arhive etichetă | cancer cells

Alkalinity, Immunity & cancer microbes – Advanced Cancer Theory

CLICK AICI pentru  limba ROmana(traducerea „aproximativa” utilizand google translate).

Prior to reading this article it is essential to read the articles:

„Cancer Causes ” (click here)

How cancer develops over a 24 months period (click here)

Cancer fungus- the link between cancer & microbes (click here)

That article explains that cancer is caused by a microbe, almost certainly Helicobacter Pylori, when it gets inside of normal cells or when a cancer cell divides and creates two daughter cancer cells which each have these microbes.

According to Independent Cancer Research Foundation, the evidence that H. Pylori causes cancer is very solid. For example:
1) It is ubiquitous in the stomach and common in the bloodstream (all humans have some cancer cells at all times),
2) It is known to be a pleomorphic microbe,
3) The most effective herb at killing H. Pylori, turmeric, is also the same herb that is most effective at treating cancer,
4) More than one alternative cancer researcher has come to the same conclusion independently.

But regardless of what the cancer microbe is, it has been known since the 1930s(starting with Royal Rife and many others) that one of the best ways to cure cancer is to kill the microbes which are inside of the cancer cells. In this way the cancer cells will revert into normal cells.

A surprising number of alternative cancer treatments work by killing the microbes inside of the cancer cells. A short list of these treatments include:
1) Vitamin C IntraVenously,

2) fruit juices (i.e. dark skinned grapesberries, etc)

3) Treatments using honey as carrier( i.e. turmeric and honey, ginger & honey, cinnamon & honey, etc)

4) All DMSO / All MSM treatments ( similar to honey as carrier treatments but CAN be used by patients with severe cachexia – see my book, english/international version),

5) Ultraviolet light, etc

For most alternative cancer treatments the size and shape of this microbe is irrelevant, but for two categories of alternative cancer treatments the sizes and shapes of this microbe are critical to understand because they can affect the killing of this microbe and/or the issue of cancer remission.

These two categories are:

1)highly alkaline protocols(i.e.Cesium, Calcium, Budwig)

2)electromedicine protocols that work by vibrating this microbe until it bursts (e.g. Royal Rife or „frequency generator” protocols -see my book).

The cancer microbe is a highly pleomorphic microbe, meaning it has many forms/shapes and sizes.

Here is a chart of the 16 different sizes (not to proportion) as discovered by professor Gaston Naessens and published in the book: The Persecution and Trial of Gaston Naessens, by Christopher Bird:


Naessens


The above chart does not show the proportional sizes or the shapes of the cancer microbe.

 

The size of the cancer microbe can literally be much smaller than a virus (which is why it can get inside of the cell nucleus and damage the cell DNA), but can be as big as a red blood cell!!

The size and shape turn out to be significant, especially in the larger and smaller forms of the microbe.

This article will discuss the importance of these shapes and sizes in the treatment of cancer.


Cancer Theory and Alkaline Treatments

The size and shape turn out to be significant, especially in the larger and smaller forms of the microbe.

The cancer microbe changes its shape and size based on the acidity or alkalinity of the inside of the cell.

As you should remember from this article about how ancer develops in time, in every healthy person, with a strong immune system, this microorganisms can exist in somatid. spore, & double spore forms( the smallest forms). As discovered by professor Gaston Naessens with the powerful microscope he invented (somatoscoppe/ dark field microspoce), in a favorable environment(acidic/low PH/Low oxygen, eventually high in sugar) & a weak immune system, these microorganisms can take other, bigger 13 forms, that form a symbiosis with cancer cells and cause a lot of damage by themselves as well.Read cancer causes.

As the alkalinity of the inside of the cancer cell goes down (i.e. the acidity goes up), the size of the cancer microbe goes up.

As the alkalinity inside the cancer cell goes up, the size of the cancer microbe goes down.

 

We can look at any calcium or cesium  (and possibly baking soda) to understand what is going on inside the cancer cells.

As calcium or cesium get inside the cancer cells, the alkalinity of the cancer cells increases.

If the calcium or cesium gets inside the cancer cells fast enough, it may kill all of the microbes inside the cancer cells and the cancer cells will revert into normal cells(as now nothing holds the cell hostage and prevents it from restoring it’s normal functions).

However, in some cases the microbes may be able to survive the highly alkaline substances. As the alkalinity inside the cells increases, the microbes may die or may go into hibernation (the „Somatid” state in the above chart).

This happens especially if the alkalinity does not occur fast enough

These pleomorphic cancer microbes do not like environments that are high in oxygen/high PH/high alkaline, thus do not spread in these environments.Some of them will die in these environments but some will just go back to somatid form(just as they exist in a healthy person)

When this microbe is in hibernation, it cannot be killed by anything!! This has actually been observed by several different cancer researchers (who, by the way, called this microbe by different names, such as „bion,” BX or „microzyma”)!!

In the book: The Persecution and Trial of Gaston Naessens is this quote:

    • „… over the years somatids were revealed to be virtually indestructible! They have resisted exposure to carbonization temperatures of 200 degree C and more. They have survived exposure to 50,000 rems of nuclear radiation, far more than enough to kill any living thing. They have been totally unaffected by any acid. Taken from centrifuge residues, they have been found impossible to cut with a diamond knife, so unbelievably impervious to any such attempts is their hardness.”

page 5

While not in the somatid state, the alkalinity inside of cells makes these microbes lethargic, which largely neutralizes the damage they are doing. These microbes damage the body and cancer cells in several ways, but in this context I am talking about the fact that they can force the cancer cell to replicate very quickly.

If the alkalinity does not occur fast enough, and thus does not kill these microbes, the microbes may eventually go into the somatid or hibernation state.

If these microbes go into hibernation, the cancer cells will be able to restore their metabolism and will appear to be normal cells!!! In other words, when in hibernation these microbes do not intercept glucose and do not excrete mycotoxins. So just like when these microbes are killed, the cancer cells revert into normal cells.

But in these cases the cells appear to be normal cells, and act as if they were normal cells, but in fact they are still cancer cells in the sense that there are still microbes inside the cells!!

When the person stops or changes their cancer treatment, and goes off of their alkaline cancer treatment, and goes back to their old acidic diet, eventually the inside of the cancer cells gets acidic and the microbes come out of hibernation and the cancer „returns” in the same location it was before!!

I personally know people in these situation, i.e.people that used Cesium for 3 months , the tumor was declared inactive, and, when going back to old habits & lifestyle, cancer returned in the same location.

Actually, the cancer cells never left, they simply „went into hibernation” because the microbes were in hibernation. When the microbes came out of hibernation they started intercepting glucose again and excreting mycotoxins again. The cells again acted as if it were cancerous.

This is a key sign as to what is happening, the cancer returns in exactly the same location it was before!!

Thus, the new cancer is not caused by „new cancer cells,” it is caused by „old cancer cells” which were cancer cells which reverted into being normal cells, but when the cell interior again became acidic the somatids came out of hibernation and again started intercepting glucose and excreting mycotoxins.

Remember, every healthy person may have these microbes inside and there are 2 things that allow these microbes to develop and spread( i.e: change from somatid, spore & double spore form to a more harmful, cancer-symbiotic form);

1) a weak immune system( a strong immune system kills the harmful forms),

2) acidity/low PH/ low oxygen( a favorable environment in witch these microbes thrive & spread fast).  

This is why people who are using an alkaline protocol as their cancer treatment,need  to strengthen the immune system as well.So that if these cancer microbes are not killed by alkalinity , the immune system will make sure it kills them if they try to go back to harmful states.

Unfortunately, it takes a lot of time to strengthen the immune system( more than the time in witch an alkaline treatment such as Cesium will put ones cancer in remission) . 

 This is why, when people are done with their alkaline treatment they need to stay on an alkaline diet for a long time  to keep the microbes in hibernation (and keep the cancer from coming back) while stregthening the immune system or they need another powerful treatment that does not use alkalinity at core

The alkaline protocols (e.g. calcium, cesium, vitamin C IV etc.) are very good protocols and are absolutely critical to keeping advanced cancer patients alive!! Nothing can keep advanced cancer patients alive as well as these protocols!! These protocols have saved many, many lives, so this is not a criticism of these protocols.

My point is, as I say on other web pages, that when a cancer patient finishes one of these protocols they must  stay on an alkaline „cancer diet” for a long time and keep on stregthening their immune system.

I will write an article about the solution developed by professor Gaston Naessens for strengthening the immune system, 714X.

Meanwhile, some examples of immune treatments are medicinal mushrooms(see my book for a more powerful option) or even some electromedicine like Bob Beck 


Cancer Theory and Electromedicine Treatments

It has been demonstrated many times that if you kill all of the microbes inside of a cancer cell, the cancer cell will revert into a normal cell.

Some good examples of treatments that kill these microbes inside cancer cells , yopu can do at home right now:

1) Vitamin C IntraVenously(also  extends life),

2) fruit juices (i.e. dark skinned grapesberries, etc)

3) Treatments using honey as carrier( i.e. turmeric and honey, ginger & honey, cinnamon & honey, etc)

4) All DMSO / All MSM treatments ( similar to honey as carrier treatments but, unlike hoey/ glucose, these CAN be used by patients with severe cachexia – see my book, english/international version),

One of themost efficeint ways to kill these microbes is with electromedicine, especially if the electromedicine device has a „carrier wave.”

Using a remarkable new microscope he designed and built in 1930 Royal R. Rife cultured tissue from a breast cancer sample, in Kendall medium, and isolated a micro-organism. He followed this experiment with a series of other studies in which he cultured an organism in Kendall media, from tissue taken from a human breast cancer. He then injected this microorganism into 412 healthy rats, and found that without fail they all developed breast cancer.

 Finally, he was then able to isolate the original microorganism from the tumours which grew in the rats. In the process Rife became probably the first person ever to fulfil Koch’s postulants, for cancer causing microbes. Koch’s Postulants are a set of rules to prove the causation of disease by microorganisms. They state that to prove such causality the microorganism must first be isolated and cultured. It must then be shown to have infected a health animal, and finally the same organism must be recoverable from the now infected animal.
The cancer virus which Rife named Cryptocides Primordiales or the BX virus, was a minute 1/5 micron in length and 1/20 micron in width. It was highly motile, aerobic (requiring free oxygen for its survival) and highly pathogenic.
Rife discovered that while exposing the virus to a temperature of 42C for 24 hours would kill the virus(an additional reason why hyperthermia works), it remained unaffected by exposure to either X-ray, UV or Infra-red waves. 
While the discovery of a cancer virus was in itself an incredible feat of scientific endeavour, Rife was to make yet more discoveries destined to rock the scientific status quo. The BX virus was shown to be a polymorphic(meaning it has/can change in many forms) virus, able to change its states according to the culture in which it was grown. When a BX virus was cultivated in a different media, it was seen to change into a BY virus. When the media was changed yet again it developed into a monococcoid in the monocytes of the blood, and with a further change of media it morphed once again, this time into crytomyces pleomorphia fungi. At any stage along this journey of polymorphism, the original BX virus could be grown again by adding any one of these forms to the original media.
 Everything was documented with film, photographs and meticulous records.
Next he was able to use a certain frequency of energy produced by a machine he developed that could destroyed these cancer causing viruses in the body without harming any normal cells. All of this was in the 1930s.

Royal Rife’s electromagnetism machine had a 100% cure rate of terminal cancer patients.

NOTE: Dr Rife  observed these cancer microbes can NOT be killed faster than they can spread in an acidic (low PH. low oxygen ) environment. Thus,,raising alkalinity / oxygen levels (Stopping the spread of cancer) is more important. This can be done safely with the help of an alkaline dietalkaline minerals(Cesium,Calcium), Ozone/Oxygen therapies

So how do these devices kill the microbes which are inside of a cancer cell?

It is generally believed that each of the 16 shapes and sizes of the cancer microbe has a different „Mortal Oscillatory Rate” or M.O.R., meaning they have a different frequency at which they vibrate until they explode and die.

Think of a wine glass being shattered by an opera singer. At a certain frequency the glass will shatter. Likewise, each microbe has a specific frequency (i.e. M.O.R.) at which it will „explode” and die.

In theory, this would imply that it would take 16 different frequencies to kill the „cancer microbe.” Well, it is not that simple.

The Independent Cancer Research Foundation will determine these frequencies if they ever get enough funding. But for now understand that it has been shown by those using electromedicine, by trial and error, that taking some ionized water makes the device more effective.

This makes perfect sense because at the larger sizes and shapes, finding an effective frequency to vibrate them until they explode may be very difficult. This may be exacerbated by the shapes of the larger sizes. Some shapes may prevent a uniform and consistent vibration.

By taking some ionized water the alkalinity inside the cancer cells will go up and the size of the microbes will go down into the mid-size range of the microbe sizes.

However, it has also been shown that when too much ionized water is taken, in conjunction with an alkaline treatment, that the microbe becomes too small to kill by the frequency range of the device.

These conclusions were based on case studies.

Much more research needs to be done in this area, but for now realize that the cardinal rule of using electromedicine is to take a reasonable amount of ionized or alkaline water, but do not be fanatical. By using moderation the size and shape of the cancer microbe will be in the middle range and it will be easier to kill the microbes by using vibrations.

This is a highly theoretical discussion, but the theory coincides with the actual success of the devices.

Note:

Devices that use technology that replicate  1930s Rife machines, are described in my book .


Final Comments and Summary

This article is in no way a criticism of the alkaline or electromedicine protocols. They are superb protocols that can do things no other protocols can do!! Many, many cancer patients are alive today because of these protocols!!

In fact, the alkaline „super protocols” are the highly recommended protocols for very advanced cancer patients.

However, it is important to understand key principles in how to maximize the effectiveness of these protocols.

With alkaline protocols the way to maximize their effectiveness is to stay on an alkaline diet for life or until you manage to strengthen your immune system or  to use a non-alkaline cancer protocol when the alkaline protocol is completed .

With electromedicine protocols the way to maximize the effectiveness of these protocols is to use some alkalinity to put the microbes in the middle size range and stop them from spreading faster than they can be killed, but to not use too much alkalinity. „Moderation” of alkalinity is a good term.


Cancer Research By Others

The ICRF is not the only cancer research organization in the United States, much less throughout the world. Here are links to other cancer research going on around the world:

Cancer Research on Deuterium Depletion (the research is in Hungary)

The Gabor Somyais book

good to know about:

www.cerbe.com (714x)

www.zellkreis.de (Tamara Lebedewa)

Hulda Clark

Tullio Simmoncini

Anunțuri

MINERALS & high PH therapies

CLICK AICI pentru  limba ROmana(traducerea „aproximativa” utilizand google translate).

 

This is an introductory post about some minerals that play more importance in preventing and treating cancer than others.

These minerals are :

CESIUM click here (also POTASSIUM & RUBIDIUM)

GERMANIUM click here

IODINE click here

SELENIUM click here 

ZINC click here

CALCIUM click here

Some of these minerals (cesium, potassium, rubidium,  calcium etc)are highly alkaline, thus help create alkalinity in our bodies  , thus are used in high PH therapies.

WHAT IS HIGH PH THERAPY

Cancer cells thrive in an anaerobic (low oxygen) environment.

A low oxygen environment is a environment with low pH values.

The term pH refers to concentration of the Hydrogen proton. Or, some will claim percentage of Hydrogen. There are other definitions including acid/alkaline balance. In general chemistry, acidic compounds tend to expel oxygen, while alkaline orbase compounds (opposite of acid) absorb oxygen. A glass of vinegar and water will not absorb oxygen from the air, whilea glass of baking soda in water tends to do that. So, pH puts a number on the degree of acidity.

Nearly all those with cancer have high acidity.

Raising the cell pH makes it hard for cancer cells /cancer microbes inside cancer cells to survive.

NOTE:

What happens is more complex and you should read cancer causes (click here) to understand the above .

The cells of the body can only live within a certain pH range or they will die. When we eat or drink, we affect our body’s pH values.

When we take in something acidic, or of low pH (low oxygen) values, the body either has to pull alkaline minerals from within itself to neutralize the acid, or store the acid somewhere in the tissue.

If you drink an acidic soda at pH 2.5, it takes 32 glasses of water at pH 10 to neutralize the acid. And, as one’s pH drops, the cells’ oxygen levels also drop, and its ability to function properly and heal itself diminishes drastically.

The pH number is an exponent number of 10; therefore, a small difference in pH translates to a big difference in the number of oxygen or OH- ions. A difference of 1 in a pH value means ten times the difference in the number of OH- ions, a difference of 2 means one hundred times the difference in the number of OH- ions. In other words, blood with a pH value of 7.45 contains 64.9% more oxygen than blood with a pH value of 7.30. http://www.stopcancer.com/toc.htm

 „A normal cell undergoes an adverse change when it can no longer use the oxygen to convert glucose into energy by oxidation .. In the absence of oxygen the cell returns to a primitive nutritional program to sustain itself, converting glucose, by fermentation. lactic acid produced by fermentation lowers the cell pH (acid / alkaline balance) and destroys the ability of DNA and RNA to control cell division [..] cancer cells begin to multiply uncontrollably and  lactic acid simultaneously causes intense local pain and destroys cell enzymes .. Therefore, cancer appears as a rapidly growing mass of cells on the outside with a core cell death. http://www.cancer-coverup.com/fighters/cesium-science.htm

In the absence of oxygen, glucose is subjected to fermentation and creates lactic acid. This causes the pH to drop in the cell between 7.3 – 7.2 , down to 7 – 6.5, and in more advanced stages of cancer and metastasis sites pH can be lower than 6.0 and even 5.7. http://www.alkalizeforhealth.net/Loxygen3.htm

The bottom line is alkalinity plays an important role in PREVENTING, HEALING and KEEPING CANCER AWAY

Some minerals such as Calcium, Cesium ,Potassium ,Rubidium help create alkalinity fast within our bodies,thus prevent cancer from appearing, STOP THE SPREAD OF CANCER & kill part of the cancer cells.

 

Other minerals as Germanium, Iodine, Selenium & Zinc are important for other reasons.

For example Selenium, Zinc & Germanium are important for proper function of immune system.

Germanium renders oxygen available for the cells, with the important implications therefore for cancer.

Zinc is also required for vitamin B17 therapy.

Selenium has also been shown to aid in slowing cancer’s progression; use of selenium during chemotherapy in combination with vitamin A and vitamin E can reduce the toxicity of chemotherapy drugs. The mineral also helps “enhance the effectiveness of chemo, radiation, and hyperthermia while minimizing damage to the patient’s normal cellsl

Iodine deficiency is a major cause of breast cancer and other diseases of the reproductive organs such as ovarian, uterus and prostrate cysts and cancers.Iodine can have a significant impact in curing breast cancer

Some of these minerals have effects as Radioprotective, Anti-Tumoral, Antineoplastic , Antiproliferative, Anti-Angiogenic &/or Apoptotic, according to scientific studies.

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTE:

Please note that taking some minerals or supplements , though they are important and can prove vital on short term (i.e. Cesium for terminal patients ) it is NOT sufficient.

One should consider an alkaline lifestyle if he/she wants to prevent, survive, heal, and keep cancer away once  healed.

Supplements may provide their advantages on the short term, but on the long term, the whole body must be re-balanced and the immune system must be strengthened.

At a systemic level cancer is caused by an imbalance/A person is diagnosed with cancer when there is a „weakness” in his/her body ( all people have cancer cells in their bodies & all people have an immune system that keeps them/their number under control; when there is a weakness in ones body (a weakness caused by various stress factors), cancer may speculate this weakness and grow out of control.)
This is why it is important to keep your body balanced for preventing cancer and to rebalance it to heal and keep cancer away.
This implies changes in whole lifestyle. All minerals, nutrients, physical ,chemical, psychical, emotional, energetic , etc -all factors are important and should be considered (even though some are more important than others and may help significantly on the short term (  i.e. Cesium creates alkalinity fast thus stops spread of cancer fast and can make a big difference especially for terminal cancer patient,Vitamin C can extend life , Vitamin D/sunshine can energize & keep one alive. etc)  
There is no such thing as a „miracle” cure/ „miracle pill”/ supplement  for healing cancer.
I personally know cases of stage IV cancer patients that followed the cesium therapy (i,e,.: as described in my book) for a few months, went into remission and then , when they went back to their old habits and lifestyle cancer returned, as expected, in the same place.
Preventing, Healing and Keeping cancer away means rebalacing your body and this implies changes in whole lifestyle, NOT just taking some supplements.  

Best of health!

Cristian

SHARE, LIKE, COMMENTS – buttons below!

MINERALS & high PH therapies

CLICK AICI pentru  limba ROmana(traducerea „aproximativa” utilizand google translate).

 

This is an introductory post about some minerals that play more importance in preventing and treating cancer than others.

These minerals are :

CESIUM click here (also POTASSIUM & RUBIDIUM)

GERMANIUM click here

IODINE click here

SELENIUM click here 

ZINC click here

CALCIUM click here

 

Some of these minerals (cesium, potassium, rubidium,  calcium etc)are highly alkaline, thus help create alkalinity in our bodies  , thus are used in high PH therapies.

WHAT IS HIGH PH THERAPY

Cancer cells thrive in an anaerobic (low oxygen) environment.

A low oxygen environment is a environment with low pH values.

The term pH refers to concentration of the Hydrogen proton. Or, some will claim percentage of Hydrogen. There are other definitions including acid/alkaline balance. In general chemistry, acidic compounds tend to expel oxygen, while alkaline orbase compounds (opposite of acid) absorb oxygen. A glass of vinegar and water will not absorb oxygen from the air, whilea glass of baking soda in water tends to do that. So, pH puts a number on the degree of acidity.

Nearly all those with cancer have high acidity.

Raising the cell pH makes it hard for cancer cells /cancer microbes inside cancer cells to survive.

NOTE:

What happens is more complex and you should read cancer causes (click here) to understand the above .

The cells of the body can only live within a certain pH range or they will die. When we eat or drink, we affect our body’s pH values.

When we take in something acidic, or of low pH (low oxygen) values, the body either has to pull alkaline minerals from within itself to neutralize the acid, or store the acid somewhere in the tissue.

If you drink an acidic soda at pH 2.5, it takes 32 glasses of water at pH 10 to neutralize the acid. And, as one’s pH drops, the cells’ oxygen levels also drop, and its ability to function properly and heal itself diminishes drastically.

The pH number is an exponent number of 10; therefore, a small difference in pH translates to a big difference in the number of oxygen or OH- ions. A difference of 1 in a pH value means ten times the difference in the number of OH- ions, a difference of 2 means one hundred times the difference in the number of OH- ions. In other words, blood with a pH value of 7.45 contains 64.9% more oxygen than blood with a pH value of 7.30. http://www.stopcancer.com/toc.htm

 „A normal cell undergoes an adverse change when it can no longer use the oxygen to convert glucose into energy by oxidation .. In the absence of oxygen the cell returns to a primitive nutritional program to sustain itself, converting glucose, by fermentation. lactic acid produced by fermentation lowers the cell pH (acid / alkaline balance) and destroys the ability of DNA and RNA to control cell division [..] cancer cells begin to multiply uncontrollably and  lactic acid simultaneously causes intense local pain and destroys cell enzymes .. Therefore, cancer appears as a rapidly growing mass of cells on the outside with a core cell death. http://www.cancer-coverup.com/fighters/cesium-science.htm

In the absence of oxygen, glucose is subjected to fermentation and creates lactic acid. This causes the pH to drop in the cell between 7.3 – 7.2 , down to 7 – 6.5, and in more advanced stages of cancer and metastasis sites pH can be lower than 6.0 and even 5.7. http://www.alkalizeforhealth.net/Loxygen3.htm

The bottom line is alkalinity plays an important role in PREVENTING, HEALING and KEEPING CANCER AWAY

Some minerals such as Calcium, Cesium ,Potassium ,Rubidium help create alkalinity fast within our bodies,thus prevent cancer from appearing, STOP THE SPREAD OF CANCER & kill part of the cancer cells.

Other minerals as Germanium, Iodine, Selenium & Zinc are important for other reasons.

For example Selenium, Zinc & Germanium are important for proper function of immune system.

Germanium renders oxygen available for the cells, with the important implications therefore for cancer.

Zinc is also required for vitamin B17 therapy.

Selenium has also been shown to aid in slowing cancer’s progression; use of selenium during chemotherapy in combination with vitamin A and vitamin E can reduce the toxicity of chemotherapy drugs. The mineral also helps “enhance the effectiveness of chemo, radiation, and hyperthermia while minimizing damage to the patient’s normal cellsl

Iodine deficiency is a major cause of breast cancer and other diseases of the reproductive organs such as ovarian, uterus and prostrate cysts and cancers.Iodine can have a significant impact in curing breast cancer

Some of these minerals have effects as Radioprotective, Anti-Tumoral, Antineoplastic , Antiproliferative, Anti-Angiogenic &/or Apoptotic, according to scientific studies.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

Please note that taking some minerals or supplements , though they are important and can prove vital on short term (i.e. Cesium for terminal patients ) it is NOT sufficient.

One should consider an alkaline lifestyle if he/she wants to prevent, survive, heal, and keep cancer away once  healed.

Supplements may provide their advantages on the short term, but on the long term, the whole body must be re-balanced and the immune system must be strengthened.

At a systemic level cancer is caused by an imbalance/A person is diagnosed with cancer when there is a „weakness” in his/her body ( all people have cancer cells in their bodies & all people have an immune system that keeps them/their number under control; when there is a weakness in ones body (a weakness caused by various stress factors), cancer may speculate this weakness and grow out of control.)
This is why it is important to keep your body balanced for preventing cancer and to rebalance it to heal and keep cancer away.
This implies changes in whole lifestyle. All minerals, nutrients, physical ,chemical, psychical, emotional, energetic , etc -all factors are important and should be considered (even though some are more important than others and may help significantly on the short term (  i.e. Cesium creates alkalinity fast thus stops spread of cancer fast and can make a big difference especially for terminal cancer patient,Vitamin C can extend life , Vitamin D/sunshine can energize & keep one alive. etc)  
There is no such thing as a „miracle” cure/ „miracle pill”/ supplement  for healing cancer.
I personally know cases of stage IV cancer patients that followed the cesium therapy (i,e,.: as described in my book) for a few months, went into remission and then , when they went back to their old habits and lifestyle cancer returned, as expected, in the same place.
Preventing, Healing and Keeping cancer away means rebalacing your body and this implies changes in whole lifestyle, NOT just taking some supplements.  

Best of health!

Cristian

SHARE, LIKE, COMMENTS – buttons below!

CESIUM

CLICK AICI pentru  limba ROmana(traducerea „aproximativa” utilizand google translate).

I felt it only fair to mention the protocol of Robert R. Barefoot, the co-author of the excellent book: The Calcium Factor: The Scientific Secret of Health and Youth. The other author of this book is Dr. Carl J. Reich, M.D., who worked with Nobel Prize winner Dr. Otto Warburg before Warburg’s death.

Robert R. Barefoot is a big supporter of using calcium, namely coral calcium, in treating cancer. However, he also said the following in chapter 17 of his book:

„A terminal cancer patient, for example, may be cured over a 6 month period by consuming the proper nutrients, but may only have 3 weeks to live. This situation requires a more potent nutrient treatment such as cesium chloride, for example. Cesium chloride is a natural salt, and where it is found, cancer does not exist. This is because cesium is the most caustic mineral that exists, and when it enters the body, it seeks out all of the acidic cancer hotspots, dousing the fire of cancer, thereby terminating the cancer within days. Also, when dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is rubbed near a painful cancer, the pain is removed and the DMSO causes the cesium to penetrate the cancer tumor much faster, thereby terminating the cancer much faster…”

The Calcium Factor: The Scientific Secret of Health and Youth, page 144

He also stated in his book: „The author has witnessed numerous people with terminal cancers who have employed the above program successfully.”

When it comes to the treatment of advanced cancer, stage IV cancers, rapidly growing cancers which have spread significantly, high mortality types of cancers or cancers that have spread to the bones Cesium Chloride protocol is one of the most proven existing cancer treatments. 

This treatment can be used by patients with new cancer diagnosis and by patients fed by feeding tubes or patients fed IntraVenously .

Technical details( http://www.killcancercells.com/?gclid=CI_u4oH0jbkCFQgQ3godEDQAtg) :

WHAT IS CESIUM CHLORIDE

Cesium is a rare, naturally occurring element of alkali metal, similar in chemical structure to lithium, sodium, and potassium. Cesium chloride is a salt form of this element.

Cesium chloride is most commonly associated with High pH Therapy and cancer, due to the work of Keith Brewer, Otto Warburg, and H.E.Sartori, among others. They found that cancer cells thrive in an anaerobic (low oxygen) environment with low pH values, and that raising the cell pH makes it hard for cancer cells to survive. Cesium, being one of the most alkaline elements, has a high pH value and is also readily taken up by cancer cells, thus raising their pH to a level at which they can no longer survive.

See also : http://www.essense-of-life.com/moreinfo/minerals/cesium.htm

WHAT IS HIGH PH THERAPY

The cells of the body can only live within a certain pH range or they will die. When we eat or drink, we affect our body’s pH values. When we take in something acidic, or of low pH (low oxygen) values, the body either has to pull alkaline minerals from within itself to neutralize the acid, or store the acid somewhere in the tissue. If you drink an acidic soda at pH 2.5, it takes 32 glasses of water at pH 10 to neutralize the acid. And, as one’s pH drops, the cells’ oxygen levels also drop, and its ability to function properly and heal itself diminishes drastically. The pH number is an exponent number of 10; therefore, a small difference in pH translates to a big difference in the number of oxygen or OH- ions. A difference of 1 in a pH value means ten times the difference in the number of OH- ions, a difference of 2 means one hundred times the difference in the number of OH- ions. In other words, blood with a pH value of 7.45 contains 64.9% more oxygen than blood with a pH value of 7.30. http://www.stopcancer.com/toc.htm

How CESIUM CLORIDE WORKS

 „A normal cell undergoes an adverse change when it can no longer use the oxygen to convert glucose into energy by oxidation .. In the absence of oxygen the cell returns to a primitive nutritional program to sustain itself, converting glucose, by fermentation. lactic acid produced by fermentation lowers the cell pH (acid / alkaline balance) and destroys the ability of DNA and RNA to control cell division [..] cancer cells begin to multiply uncontrollably and  lactic acid simultaneously causes intense local pain and destroys cell enzymes .. Therefore, cancer appears as a rapidly growing mass of cells on the outside with a core cell death. ” http://www.cancer-coverup.com/fighters/cesium-science.htm

In the absence of oxygen, glucose is subjected to fermentation and creates lactic acid. This causes the pH to drop in the cell between 7.3 – 7.2 , down to 7 – 6.5, and in more advanced stages of cancer and metastasis sites pH can be lower than 6.0 and even 5.7. http://www.alkalizeforhealth.net/Loxygen3.htm

The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14, with numbers below 7 representing an acidic (low oxygen) condition and above 7 representing an alkaline, or oxygenated, condition. When cesium is taken up by cancer cells, it raises the pH, or oxygen content, of the cell. The cells that die are absorbed and eliminated by the body. Cesium has been used to raise the pH of the body as an alternative or complementary cancer treatment or therapy for breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, colon cancer, pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, skin cancer, ovarian cancer, stomach cancer, cervical cancer, brain cancer, kidney cancer, testicular cancer, bone cancer, throat cancer, thyroid cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, cancers of the bladder and gallbladder, metastatic melanoma, and cancers in animals including feline, canine, and equine cancer. Keith Brewer, Otto Warburg, and H.E.Sartori all contributed to the concept of high pH therapy.  http://www.essense-of-life.com/moreinfo/minerals/cesium.htm

Cancerous tissues are acidic, whereas healthy tissues are alkaline. At a pH slightly above 7.4 cancer cells become dormant and at pH 8.5 cancer cells will die while healthy cells will live. Potassium, rubidium, and especially cesium are most efficiently taken up by cancer cells. Glucose can still enter a cancer cell, but oxygen cannot. The cell thus becomes anaerobic. In the absence of oxygen, the glucose undergoes fermentation to lactic acid. The cell pH then drops to 7 and finally down to 6.5. cesium, rubidium and potassium, all having high pH values, are able to enter cells inthis state and raise their pH. http://www.mwt.net/~drbrewer/highpH.htm

Acidity (nature of cancer cells) , is what cesium chloride treats primarily! 

Cesium is a very alkaline mineral (like Rubidium,Potassium and Calcium )! 

In particular, with regards to stopping the spread of cancer , cesium chloride is one of the best cancer treatments.

Cesium Chloride Protocol directly targets cancer cells. Normal cells do not ingest cesium chloride.

 

Cesium has been proven to get into cancer cells, when other nutrients can’t and:

1) makes the cancer cells alkaline (blood is not made alkaline, only the inside of cancer cells)

2) limits glucose intake of cancer cells (starving them, thus making them ” sick ” due to lack of food),

3) neutralizes lactic acid (due to uncontrolled multiplication of cells) and, therefore helps interrupting cachexia cycle,

4) stops the fermentation ( side effect on glucose limitation).

NOTE :

As you can notice above, as a second effect , cesium also interrrupts the  deadly cachexia cycle inside cancer cells cesium limits glucose intake of cancer cells & neutralizes lactic acid (cesium is  also sinergic with hidrazine sulphate)

The theory behind anti-cancer treatment cesium site is largely the result of Dr. A. Keith Brewer, PhD.

KEITH BREWER

Excerpts from „The High pH Therapy for Cancer Tests on Mice and Humans”

Steps Leading to the Formation of Cancer Cells:

1. Glucose can still enter the cell, but oxygen cannot. The cell thus becomes anaerobic.

2. In the absence of oxygen, the glucose undergoes fermentation to lactic acid. The cell pH then drops to 7 and finally down to 6.5.

3. In the acid medium the DNA loses its positive and negative radical sequence. In addition, the amino acids entering the cell are changed. As a consequence, the RNA is changed and the cell completely loses its control mechanism. Chromosomal aberrations may occur.

4. In the acid medium the various cell enzymes are completely changed into very toxic compounds. These toxins kill the cells in the main body of the tumor mass. A tumor therefore consists of a thin layer of rapidly growing cells surrounding the dead mass. The acid toxins leak out from the tumor mass and poison the host. They thus give rise to the pains generally associated with cancer.

Mass spectrographic and isotope studies have shown that potassium, rubidium, and especially cesium are most efficiently taken up by cancer cells. This uptake was enhanced by Vitamins A and C as well as salts of zinc and selenium. The quantity of cesium taken up was sufficient to raise the cell to the 8 pH range, where cell mitosis ceases and the life of the cell is short.

Tests on mice fed cesium and rubidium showed marked shrinkage in the tumor masses within 2 weeks. In addition, the mice showed none of the side effects of cancer.

In tests on mice, tumors implanted where significantly smaller at the end of the test in mice fed Rubidium than the controls. In addition, the test animals were showing none of the adverse effects of having cancer. Similar experiments with cesium chloride had similar successful results.

Tests have been carried out on over 30 humans. In each case the tumor masses disappeared.

Also, all pains and effects associated with cancer disappeared within 12 to 36 hours.

The more chemotherapy and morphine the patient had taken, the longer the withdrawal period.

Many tests on humans have been carried out by H. Nieper in Hannover, Germany and by H. Sartori in Washington, DC.

It has been observed that all pains associated with cancer disappear within 12 to 24 hours.

In these tests 2 gram doses of Cesium Chloride were administered three times per day after eating. In most cases 5 to 10 grams of Vitamin C and 100,000 units of Vitamin A, along with 50 to 100 mg of zinc, were also administered. Nieper and Sartori were also administering nitrilosides in the form of laetrile. There are good reasons to believe that the laetrile may be more effective than the vitamins in enhancing the pickup of cesium by the cells.

In addition to the loss of pains, the physical results are a rapid shrinkage of the tumor masses.

The material comprising the tumors is secreted as uric acid in the urine; the uric acid content of the urine increases many fold.

About 50% of the patients were pronounced terminal, and were not able to work. Of these, a majority have gone back to work.

Two side effects have been observed in some of the patients.

These are first nausea, and the second diarrhea. Both depend upon the general condition of the digestive tract.

There are a number of areas where the incidences of cancer are very low:

The Hopi Indians of Arizona have a very low incidence of cancer: 1 in 1000 as compared to 1 in 4 for the USA as a whole. Analysis of their diet shows that it meets the requirements for the high pH therapy. Hopi food is very high in potassium and exceptionally high in rubidium. Since the soil is volcanic it must also be very rich in cesium.

Some 20 years ago the incidence of cancer among the Pueblo Indians was the same as that for the Hopi Indians, but they have adopted a modern American diet and now have the same cancer rate as the rest of the US. Supermarket foods is essentially lacking rubidium and cesium and low in potassium.

The same, Hunza of North Pakistan and their diet also meets the requirements of the High pH therapy. They are essentially vegetarians, and are great fruit eaters, eating ordinarily 40 apricots per day; they always eat the kernels(laetrile), either directly or as a meal. They drink at least 4 liters of mineral spring waters which abound in the area and has been found to be very rich in cesium. Since the soil is volcanic in nature, it must be concluded that it will be rich in Cesium and Rubidium, as well as Potassium.

The Indians of Central America and on the highland of Peru and Equador also have very low incidences of cancer. The soil in these areas is volcanic with fruit in the area very high in rubidium and cesium.

Cases have been reliably reported where people with advance inoperable cancer have gone to live with these Indians, and found that all tumor masses disappear within a very few months. Clearly the food there meets the high pH requirements.

At the 1978 Stockholm Conference on Food and Cancer it was concluded that there is definitely a connection between no cancer and high PH theraphy(food+ alkaline minerals:calcium Cesium , Rubidium,Potassium.

Cesium and Rubidium salts, when present in the adjacent fluids, the pH of cancer cells will rise to the point where the life of the cell is short, and that they will also neutralize the acid toxins formed in the tumor mass and render them nontoxic.

Studies of the food intake in areas where the incidences of cancer are very low showed that it met the requirements for the high pH therapy.

Cesium, rubidium and potassium cations (positively charged ions) are all strong electron receptors which can be attracted into the membrane because of the negative potential gradient which exists across all living membranes.

The ready uptake of cesium and rubidium by the cancer cells lead the writer to the High pH therapy. This consists of feeding the patient close to 6 g of Cesium Chloride or Rubidium Chloride per day . It is sufficient however to give rise to the pH in the cancer cells, bringing them up in a few days to the 8 or above where the life of the cell is short. In addition, the presence of Cesium and Rubidium salts in the body fluids neutralizes the acid toxins leaking out of the tumor mass and renders them nontoxic.

In later writing, Dr. Brewer wrote: „The goal of the high pH therapy is the transport of large quantities of Cs+ Rb+ and glucose-free K+ across the membranes of cancer cells. During high pH therapy, Dr. H. Nieper, M.D., observed a loss of potassium which should be replaced.” Two booklets discussing Dr. Brewer’s final theories about cesium are available from the Brewer Science Library: „High pH Cancer Therapy with Cesium,” and „Cancer Its Nature and a Proposed Treatment,” both by A. Keith Brewer, Ph.D. http://www.mwt.net/~drbrewer/highpH.htm

POTASSIUM, RUBIDIUM, GERMANIUM

Mass spectrographic and isotope studies have shown that potassium, rubidium, and especially cesium are most efficiently taken up by cancer cells.

Rubidium is an alkaline trace mineral related with cesium and potassium chemically. In cancer cells, only water, sugar, potassium, cesium and rubidium are able to enter the cells, therefore rubidium is one on the minerals used in high pH therapy. In studies with mice, rubidium has helped decrease tumor growth. http://www.essense-of-life.com/moreinfo/minerals/rubidium.htm

Germanium improves oxygen flow to tissues, boosting circulation, which improves stamina and endurance. It also has antioxidant properties.    www.essense-of-life.com/moreinfo/minerals/germanium.htm

For more information about Germanium (click here)

Potassium is necessary for the transmission of nerve impulses that provide smooth coordinated muscle movement. Potassium also helps widen the blood vessels during exercise, thereby increasing blood flow to help carry away heat, and it is used to convert blood glucose to glycogen.                     http://www.essense-of-life.com/moreinfo/minerals/potassium.htm

Potassium, rubidium, and especially cesium are most efficiently taken up by cancer cells. Glucose can still enter the cell, but oxygen cannot. The cell thus becomes anaerobic. In the absence of oxygen, the glucose undergoes fermentation to lactic acid. The cell pH then drops to 7 and finally down to 6.5. cesium, rubidium and potassium, all having high pH values, are able to enter cells inthis state and raise their pH.

Information Sources:

http://www.mwt.net/~drbrewer/highpH.htm

Elements below potassium in the Electromotive Series, like calcium, are only taken up sparingly, if at all, by cancer cells.

Therefore potassium, which transports glucose, can readily enter cancer cells, but Calcium, which transports oxygen, cannot.

Dr. Brewer used the powder of ionic cesium, not a liquid form , thus has not been as effective as compared with liquid  ionic cesium chloride.

The key difference is how big the group of cesium atoms are. If a group is too large (often met with powdered versions), cesium does not penetrate inside the cancer cells. Cesium simply does not work unless it enters within cancer cells.

Liquid ionic cesium chloride makes cancer cells highly alkaline (pH> 8.0) so that the immune system attacks them and kills them (thinking they are sick).

Tehnically, cesium chloride does not directly kill cancer but allows immune system to destroy cancer cells.

Yet probably, cesium chloride recovers normal cells from cancer cells(as  cancer microbes cannot survive in higly alkaline environment and once they die due to alkalinity, nothing prevents a cell from creating normal ATP energy) . This is  the ideal way to cure cancer because of low toxicity to the body

Cesium chloride not only kills cancer cells , it immediately stops the metastasis of cancercan start shrinking tumor masses within weeks , and almost always stops the pain within 24 to 48 hours, depending of the pain.

 „Many human trials have been carried out by [late] Dr. H. Nieper in Hannover, Germany, … as well as a number of other physicians Overall, the results were satisfactory Oart f .. He noted that all pains associated with cancer disappear between 12 and 24 hours, except in very few cases where there were problems of morphine waiver, which requires a few more hours. „

Many celebrities and executives in America went to Germany to be treated by Dr. Nieper, including a U.S. president. Dr. Nieper died in 1998.

http://www.cancer-coverup.com/brewer/printbrewerreport.htm

Cesium treatment achieved a cure rate of 50% in patients with very advanced cancer, some already in a coma. 47 of the 50 patients were „hopeless” and some had only days to live .Doctors have given very high doses of cesium .  http://www.newswithviews.com/Howenstine/james14.htm

H.E. SARTORI – HUMAN STUDIES

Excepts from „Cesium Therapy in Cancer Patients”

Treatment was performed on 50 patients during the last three years at Life Sciences Universal Medical Clinics in Rockville MD and in Washington D.C. All patients were terminal subjects with generalized metastatic disease. 47 of the 50 patients studies had received maximal modalities of treatment, i.e., surgery, radiation, and various chemotherapy, before metabolic Cesium-treatment was initiated. Three patients were comatose and 14 of the patients were considered terminal due to previous treatments outcome and cancer complications.

The Cesium-treatment was given in conjunction of other supportive compounds under diet control in addition to the utilization of specific compounds to produce adequate circulation and oxygenation. According to individual cases Cesium Chloride was given at daily dosages of 6 to 9 grams in 3 equally divided doses, with vitamin A-emulsion (100,000 to 300,000 U), vitamin C (4 to 30 grams), zinc (80 to 100 mg) selenium (600 to 1,200 mcg) and amygdalin (1,500 mg) in addition to other supplementations according to the specific needs of the patient. The diet consisted mainly of whole grains, vegetables, linolenic acid rich oils (linseed, walnut, soy, wheat germ) and other supplemental food. To increase efficiency of the treatment and improve the circulation and oxygenation, the patients received the chelating agent EDTA, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and also a combination of vitamin K and Mg salts.

The 50 cancer patients studied over 3 years had generalized metastatic disease, except for 3 patients. Initial death occurrences for the initial 2 week treatment was in the same order and magnitude of these recorded for the 12 month period. The percent of survival of breast, colon, prostate, pancreas, and lung cancer accounted to approximately, 50% recovery which was higher than that noted for liver cancer and the lymphoma patients treated. An overall 50% recovery from cancer by the Cesium-therapy was determined in the 50 patients treated. Data from the autopsy made indicated the absence of tumors in patient dying within 14 days of the Cesium-treatment.

One of the most striking effects of the treatment was the disappearance of pain in all patients within 1 to 3 days after initiation of the Cesium-therapy.

These studies were performed under my direction, initiated in April, 1981.

Twenty-eight patients were initially treated with Cesium Chloride between April, 1981 to October, 1982. They were subjected to various cancer therapies, e.g., surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, and were considered terminal cases with metastatic disease except for 3 patients who were not previously treated. Three patients were comatose at the time of the Cesium treatment. Thirteen patients died within less than 2 weeks of treatment. Each patient showed a reduction in tumor mass by the Cesium-treatment. Of the breast cancer patients, the most impressive effect was seen on a female patient who was comatose at the beginning of the Cesium-treatment and was considered a terminal case. The Cesium-therapy, with other ingredients used, was immediately instituted by nasogastric route because there was no cooperation from the patient. The daily Cesium Chloride dose given amounted to 30 grams, 10 grams given 3 times daily. The patient was able to leave after 5 days of treatment. However the patient’s fall on the floor resulted in complications, i.e., fracture of the neck, and death. The autopsy revealed that the cancer metastasis had essentially eaten away her hip bone causing this tragic accident. The autopsy performed also showed the presence of very little cancer tissue.

The next most frequent cancer treated was of unknown primary.

Treatment of 8 cases showed a death rate of 2 within 14 days of treatment and an additional 2 deaths within 12 months while 4 of the patients are still living. In one case, an autopsy was made in a patient after one week of Cesium-treatment and showed a complete disappearance of the cancer. There were 7 cases of colon cancer patients who were treated with Cesium Chloride. Two of these patients died within 14 days, one of the patients had previous massive chemotherapy, and little time was available to restore her metabolic condition. The previous existing infiltration of the abdominal wall disappeared. However, no consent was given for an autopsy.

In one lymphoma case the patient displayed an unusually large abdomen which was hard and he weighed approximately 250 pounds. The massively enlarged abdomen began to decline in volume, i.e., a loss of approximately 120 pounds of body weight was noted after 3 months of the Cesium- therapy. The spleen which was originally maximally enlarged and reaching into the pelvis was reduced to almost normal size. The liver position was down to about the level of the umbilicus and was also reduced to normal size in 3 months. The patient is still living after 3 years after his discharge. Unfortunately, there is no follow-up on this patient and he is being maintained on chemotherapy.

The results presented demonstrate the rate of efficacy of Cesium Chloride in cancer therapy.

The total 50 TERMINAL cancer cases studied show an impressive 50% survival rate. This confirms the work of Messiha reported in these proceedings showing that the higher the dose it is, the more effective it seems to be. The autopsy obtained from the patient whose death was attributed to traumatic fracture of the neck, indicated that cancer had been initially further advanced resulting in bone destruction. However, the absence of cancer after the massive Cesium Chloride dose used in this case is demonstrable of the Cesium-therapy. It appears that both dosage, i.e., as much as 30 grams/day and route of drug administration, i.e., nasogastric pathway, might have contributed to the patients rapid recovery. It should be noted, however, that Cesium Chloride dose regimens should no exceed 20 to 40 grams due to side effects, mainly nausea, and diarrhea. The authors personal experience with Cesium Chloride after an acute dose of 40 prams Cesium Chloride indicate that extensive nausea and parethesia around the mouth are the major side effects. This is probably due to K depletion. The usual dose used in the clinic ranges from 2 to 3 grams given by mouth 3 times daily. At a later time, at which time there is no indication of cancer presence, the Cesium Chloride dosage will be reduced to a preventative dose between .5 and 1 gram a day.

The lymphoma case presented shows that Cesium Chloride efficiently reduced massive enlargements of spleen and liver as well as maximal ascites, causing an abdominal configuration of a tight, hard hemisphere, to almost normalize after 3 months of therapy. This period of time was required to eliminate such a massive volume resulting in the reduction of the body weight noted.

The clinical efficacy of Cesium Chloride high pH metabolic therapy is best demonstrated by a recent case of primary liver cancer (not included in the 50 cases reported in this study). The patient was a 39 year old female teacher who was terminal. She was brought on a stretcher on April 25, 1984 with a large liver tumor extending approximately 3 cm below the umbilical level. The treatment was then immediately instituted. This consisted of administration of Cesium Chloride, Beta-carotene, Vitamin C, Zn, Se, Mn, Cr, and K salts by the oral route in addition to a concomitant massive IV doses of ascorbate, K, Mg, Zn, Cn, Mn, Cr salts, B complex vitamins, folic acid, DMSO and heparin. After 5 consecutive treatment regimens EDTA was introduced to the therapy and the minerals present in the solution were discontinued. On May 10, 1984, the patient was discharged, returned home walking without assistance and displaying a smile on her face. The liver tumor had shrunk to 5 cm above the umbilicus. The determination of alphafetoprotein (AFP), a specific marker for liver cancer, rare embronal cancer and teratomas, decreased from the unusually high value of 39,000 units, compared to normal levels of 13 units, measured before initiation of Cesium-therapy, to 5000 units obtained on the last day of treatment.

The mechanism of action of Cesium in cancer has been little studied. That both Cs+ and Rb+ can specifically enter the cancer cells and embryonic cells but not normal adult cells has been demonstrated by Brewer. The cancer cells contain high amounts of hydrogen ions rendering them acidic and they also contain high Na+ levels than found in normal cells. If Cs+ or Rb+ can enter the cancer cells then the pH increases from as low as 5.5 to over pH 7.0. At a pH of 7.6 the cancer cell division will stop, at a pH of 8.0 to 8.5 the lifespan of it is considerably shortened (only hours). In one case, the author has observed the shrinkage of metastases of breast cancer after one hour of Cesium-treatment. Two days later wrinkles of the skin appeared where the tumor was present. In another case of a colon cancer with massive metastasis, of massive infiltration of the abdominal wall, liver and other tissues, seemed to have been reduced within 24 hours and continuing rapidly until the demise of the patient on the 14th day of the Cesium-treatment.

The uric acid levels measured at the onset of treatment was approximately 3.5 units which was increased to over 20 units, suggesting massive breakdowns of DNA, which produces the uric acid output. Therefore, destruction of nuclear acids, as reflected by a significant rise in the uric acid, may be used as a predictive measurement for treatment outcome. The failure of uric acid elevation may be indicative of lack of destruction of cancer cells. This has proven to be a very consistent finding in our clinic. http://www.advancedhealthplan.com/2cesiumchlorideforcancer2.html

Though it is a very powerful treatment and can offer terminal cancer patients many chances, CESIUM comes with many WARNINGS (warnings that many cesium vendors „fotget” to mention) and should NOT be used by  everyone(ATTENTION  those with DANGEROUS TUMORS( any situation when the temporary tumor swelling or inflamation can put the life of the patient  in danger: BRAIN cancer, LUNG cancer,etc. ).

Also , Potassium levels MUST be monitored.

There are many things to say and more details about using CESIUM as well as a POWERFUL(STAGE IV) cancer treatment in my book.

For studies about calcium and cancer( click here)

Best of health!

Cristian

SHARE, LIKE, COMMENTS – buttons below!

Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT).

CLICK AICI pentru  limba ROmana(traducerea „aproximativa” utilizand google translate).

For those of you still interested in an more effective form of chemotherapy (about 10 times more effective), safer – using less chemo drugs(about 10 times the standard chemo doze) thus, without the major side effects of chemotherapy here is an article about   IPT(Insulin Potentiation Therapy), a technique that gets chemo drugs directly into cancer cells ( about 10 times more inside cancer cells than in normal cells,to be more specific)  .

Though IPT is not  detailed  in my book, I’ ve contacted  Annie Brandt , Founder & Executive Director ,BEst Answer for Cancer Foundation ,  „Thriving While Surviving”  , A Whole-Being Healing Platform + Targeted Cancer Therapies = Integrative Oncology , www.bestanswerforcancer.org and  http://www.iptforcancer.com/ and am waiting for their review and updates as well (as mentioned in previousposts, I am alos waiting for reviews and updates from the Gerson Institute – run by Charlotte Gerson , daughter of Dr. Gerson , The Metabolic  Institute  – coordinated by the son of l Dr William Kelley , Issels clinic –  coordinated by wife of  Dr Iosef Issels, Hope4Cancer clinic  ICRF Inc,  cancertutor and others.I’ll let you know about the institutes centers and clinics this site officially endorses and is endorsed by officially ( mutual support including  and exchangeof knowledge and experience)

Cancer chemotherapy
without major side effects.

Gentle cancer treatment
without trauma.

Infectious disease treatment:  faster and more effective.
Could fight drug resistance.

Available to patients today, with no need to wait years for government (FDA) approval.

More than 70 years of  successful use.   

With IPT, regular drugs act like „super” drugs, for treatment of many different diseases.

These are observations that some IPT doctors have reported for many years.

Supported by scientific papers, and reports from many doctors.  However, despite more than 140 years of cumulative reported IPT success, and billions of dollars spent on other medical research, no clinical or laboratory research on IPT has been done or funded… yet.

IPT deserves laboratory studies and clinical trials.

„The second discovery of insulin.” ™

IPT is insulin potentiation therapy, a non-diabetic use of the hormone insulin to dramatically improve effectiveness and delivery of standard medications.
IPT has an outstanding 135 doctor-year track record (115 years for cancer) over 72 years, and is ready for clinical trials and widespread use.

Donato Perez Garcia MD and IPT patientCancer treatment with IPTis reported to be gentler, safer, more effective, and less expensive, with no surgery, no radiation, and usually no side effects. 

Breakthrough results have also been reported for arthritis, as well as for infectious, respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, and other diseases.

This slight modification of standard medicine could help many medications act like super drugs, with better results for many millions of patients.  The US National Institutes of Health has expressed interest in clinical trials of IPT for cancer, but has so far provided no funding. 

Donato Perez Garcia MD (1896-1971), discoverer of IPTIPT is 21st century medicine. Donato Perez Garcia y Bellon MD (1930-2000)Discovered in 1926 by Donato Perez Garcia MD, fostered by his son and grandson, with 140+ doctor-years of experience over 72 years, yet still unknown by the world, IPT is just starting a scientific and clinical rebirth.

    IPT =  Insulin Potentiation Therapy
=  Quest, Questions, Quality, Cue, and Queue. 

„The second discovery of insulin” ™

IPTQ lifeboat logo, with IPT on side, and Q-shaped life ring

IPTQ News

First IPT clinical trial datapublished December 4, 2003.  IPT significantly improved outcomes for advanced breast cancer patients. 

Chinese lab data  published Feb. 2003 show that insulin significantly increases tumor cell killing effect of three chemotherapy drugs on esophageal and lung cancer cell lines.

IPT doctors are now listed on
GetIPT.com

IPT Training Workshops forDoctors.  Information on GetIPT.com  or  email for info

Historic 1976 IPT paper now available on IPTQ.com. (10/19/03)

„Treating Cancer with IPT”,
 IPT book, by Ross (MD) and Marion Hauser (MS, RD), is now available.  

Dr. Perez Garcia, Dr. SGA, and IPTQ webhost C. Duffield received 
The Caring Pioneer Award
 at the gala release event in Chicago.

Historic Polio movie shows IPTsuccesses in the 1950s.

Case study of Laurie Shaw, survivor of breast cancer with metastases.  „…cancer free, healthy, strong, and whole.”

Cellular Therapy, a historical book by Donato Perez Garcia (1), in a new English translation by Aime Ricci, is now available publicly for the first time, on IPTQ.com.

IPT training:  Dr. Perez Garcia watches Dr. HauserIPT training for physicians is available now, in a workshop in the US, or privately in the clinics of Dr. Perez Garcia or Dr. SGA.  

IPT is available now from
almost 80 doctors worldwide,   

in 8 countries: the US,  Canada, Mexico,  Argentina, Brazil, France, Switzerland, Venezuelaand  Ecuador.  Also one veterinarian in Arizona.  

Anthrax and bioterrorism – Could IPT be a better and faster treatment for serious bacterial and viral infections?  Research urgently needed.

IPT presented to the US NIHseveral times, but so far without results.

Six books about IPT, an IPTQ exclusive.

Interview with Donato Perez Garcia MD 3.

IPT slide show, updated.

Letters about IPT to and from public figures.

Details and more news…

Web-Stat hit counter
Number of website visitors
since August 2002
(Click on box for detailed statistics)

What people have said about IPT:

„I feel like I am the recipient of a miracle.  I feel a gratitude that words will never express.” – former IPT patient Donna McDermott .

„IPT needs to be the treatment of choice with chemo. There should be no question about that. For everyone, especially children, the risks and side effects are so much less than with regular administration of chemo.” – Susan Holder, nurse and mother of a child with cancer.

„I am honored to be an instructor in IPT and must  thank you again and again for not only changing my life but life of all my  past, present and future patients…you [Dr. Donato Perez Garcia] and your father and grandfather are great men, there is no doubt.”
–an IPT physician and instructor

„Medicine of Hope”   – JC Paquette MD
„Medicine of Dreams”   – C Duffield PhD 

„Your ideas about making standard drugs work better are interesting….”  – former US President Bill Clinton 

„IPT is a weapon of mass benevolence.”
  –C Duffield PhD  

Cancer and IPT

IPTLD: Targeting the Cancer Cells… Not the Patient!™

Insulin Potentiation Targeted Low Dose therapy (IPTLD) is a procedure for targeting chemotherapeutic drugs directly to cancer cells, making the drugs tougher on the disease and easier on the rest of the body.

Conventional chemotherapy tends to flood the body with drugs so enough will enter the cancer cells to kill them. Each of our trillions of cells has a membrane, an outer skin, that protects it from toxins. Standard chemotherapy must be given in large enough quantities to force penetration through that membrane.

IPTLD, however, penetrates easily through the cell membrane because it goes in hand-in-hand with sugar (glucose). Cancer cells, unlike healthy cells, need lots of glucose for fuel. Without it, they die. The membrane of a cancer cell is designed to take in a lot more glucose than healthy cells. In medical parlance we say cancer cells are equipped with many more insulin receptors. So, what if we pair a small dose of chemo drugs with the glucose? Yes, the cancer cell takes in the chemotherapy drugs in its effort to get at the sugar. Using insulin allows us to differentiate the cancer cells from the normal cells. This is a significant advantage.

How does IPT actually work?

When a doctor administers IPTLD, the first thing he or she does is to gently lower the patient’s blood sugar level with insulin, the same natural hormone diabetics use. The cancer cells, because they must have sugar to live, become ravenous and open those insulin receptors wide to get at whatever they can find in the blood stream’s diminishing supply. When the blood sugar level has dropped enough, the doctor will administer a low dose of chemotherapy. The cancer cells take it in. The doctor then administers glucose which brings the patient’s blood sugar level back up to normal.

Because insulin assists in the delivery of the drugs, IPTLD uses about 90% less chemotherapy compared to conventional oncology. This means that patients continue to thrive, maintain their lifestyle, and be vital while the cancer is eradicated.

Insulin helps us in another way. Chemo is most effective when it connects with a cancer cell as it is dividing because cells are most vulnerable at that phase in their life cycle. Insulin prompts cancer cells to divide – it is thought that insulin is able to prompt cell division  at what is called the “therapeutic moment,” the moment when the doctor determines the blood sugar level has dropped enough and the chemotherapy is administered. Thus, insulin helps us deliver chemo when more cells are most vulnerable.

The cells that turn over the fastest in the human body – the ones most likely to be dividing at any one time – are in the intestine, in our mouths, and hair follicles. That is why the side effects with conventional chemo cause people to go bald and often lead to mouth and stomach ulcers, and organ failure. Without insulin, the conventional large dose of chemotherapy attacks whatever cancer cells happen to be dividing, plus the other rapidly dividing cells in the body of which there are many.

What are the benefits of IPTLD?

  • IPTLD can be very tough on tumors while being very gentle for the patient who continues to live a normal, vital lifestyle while being treated.
  • Using insulin allows us to differentiate the cancer cell population from the normal cell population. That means a lower dose of chemotherapy can be used and this is important since these drugs have considerable toxicity associated with them.
  • IPTLD reduces chemotherapy side effects in normal cells.
  • IPTLD enhances chemotherapy’s killing effectiveness in cancer cells. A 1981 study found that using insulin increased the killing effect of the chemo drug methotrexate by a factor of 10,000, for example.[1]
  • Gentle treatment and the use of complementary therapies to strengthen the immune system is our body’s best natural defense against the return of cancer. View additionalComplementary Therapies.
  • IPTLD treatments cost significantly less than conventional chemo.

STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY VS. IPT LowDose

Effect Standard Chemotherapy IPTLD
Aggressively kills cancer Y Y
Hair Loss Y Mild or none
Nausea Y Mild or none
Loss of Appetite/Anorexia Y Mild or none
Diarrhea Y N
Reproductive Organs Effected/Sterility Y N
Ultimate Increase of MDM2 Leading to Depletion of p53 Gene Y N
Immune System is Damaged Y N
Cancer is strengthened Y N
Severe Physical & Mental Fatigue Y N
Healthy Cells DNA Distortion Making Y N
Them Pre-Cancerous Y N
Thrombocytopenia Y N
Anemia Y Mild or none
Infections Y Mild or none
Neutropenia Y N
Emotional Side Effects Y N
Chemo Brain side effect Y N

What cancers respond to IPTLD?

IPTLD has been reported to work especially well for breast, prostate, lung, colon, stomach cancers, lymphoma, and melanoma. There are also reports of IPTLD bringing responses and remissions to patients with some very difficult cancers, including pancreatic, ovarian, and renal cell cancers. Other cancers successfully treated are blood, bone, cervical, esophageal, lip, mouth, neck, small intestines, testicular, throat, thyroid, uterine and vaginal.

Why doesn’t my regular oncologist use IPTLD?

IPTLD uses only about 10% to 15% of the pharmaceutical drugs used in traditional chemotherapy. Understandably, the pharmaceutical industry has been slow to encourage doctors to use less of their product. Medical school curriculum is still focused on insulin’s use in diabetes.

Credit for the discovery of insulin in 1921 goes to Dr. Frederick Banting, a Canadian surgeon. In the early 1930s, Dr. Donato Perez Garcia, a Mexican surgeon, discovered that giving insulin to a patient would allow more antibiotic drugs to penetrate the blood brain barrier. In the 1940s, he discovered that the same technique would allow more chemotherapeutic drugs to enter cancer cells, thus opening the way for targeted chemotherapeutic treatments that do not damage nearly as many healthy cells.

IPTLD has been used for cancer worldwide since 1946; it has been used in the United States since 1997.

View PDF: How I Deal With My Cancer? By Dr. Donato Perez Garcia

NOTE: The Best Answer for Cancer Foundation is not, in any way, associated with Dr. Donato Perez Garcia.

[1]Alabaster, A; Vonderhaar, B; Shafie S. Metabolic modification by insulin enhances methotrexate cytotoxicity in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 17:1223-1228

Rewriting the Book of Oncology  ™

„I treat patients; I do not treat cancer.”  – Dr. Perez Garcia 3

Joy, not despair.

Cancer is one of the most successful applications of insulin potentiation therapy (IPT).  This method was first used to treat cancer in 1945, by Dr. Perez Garcia 1, and has been used with very good results by all the IPT doctors since.

The treatment of cancer patients with IPT is, it appears, harmless at worst, and spectacular at best.   If cancer is caught early enough (which can be rather advanced), and if there is a chemotherapy drug or combination that has been found effective, complete remission with IPT is a very common occurrence.  And all this without surgery, radiation, or major side effects.   IPT cancer patients often feel (and look) better from the first treatment on, and often appear lively and enthusiastic.  Even if IPT does not achieve complete remission, it  generally helps relieve symptoms and pain, and improves quality of life for the days that remain to the patient.  And at worst, reminiscent of of the Hippocratic Oath, it does no harm.

Once when I was visiting Dr. Perez Garcia 3 in his office, he showed me a follow-up CAT scan of one of his cancer patients, now in complete remission.  Although there was absolutely no trace of tumors on the images, the radiologist, knowing the patient’s history, had apparently felt obliged to write that the tumors were now „almost invisible”.  Donato laughed, „Yes, I am the doctor who can make your tumors ‘almost invisible’ … for the rest of your life!”

Wouldn’t every oncologist in the world like to have a tool that would allow him to joke with such joy?

Instead, oncology today offers a great deal of hope, but only after guiding the patient through a grim battlefield of mutilation (surgery), burning (radiation), and/or poisoning („normal” or high dose chemotherapy).  Grim side effects are accepted as common, likely, often inevitable, and are dealt with as well as possible:  surgical scars and adhesions, hair loss, weight loss, nausea, sterility, immune system depression, and secondary infections.  Survival for five years is considered a „cure”, no matter how much damage has been done to the patient’s general health.  And the sad reality is that a large fraction of patients who die of cancer „complications” actually die from the side effects of treatment.  (My own father certainly did.)

No wonder a new diagnosis of cancer is usually such a big shock to a patient.  Cancer diagnosis often triggers strong negative reactions in many people:  shame, horror, fatalism.  IPT could provide new hope.  If cancer is detected early, the IPT protocol appears to offer a good chance for complete remission without major negative side effects.

It seems almost too easy.  My guess is that, even after IPT becomes proven, there will still be people who choose the former standard methods, under the misimpression that more suffering will bring better results.  But the majority of patients will be overjoyed to go with a gentler, safer therapy.

While no statistics have been reported for IPT success rates for various cancer types, here is a rough estimate given by Dr. Perez Garcia 3 in an email, based on his years of experience.   To summarize:

For tumor less than 4 cm, and no other therapies (chemo, radiation) have been used:
full remission rate 95%.

For tumor greater than 4 cm,  and no other therapies used:
full remission rate 80%.

For recurrence/metastasis after other therapies were used:
full remission rate 25%, partial remission rate 70%, quality of life improvement 98%.

For terminally ill patients, with no liver impairment:
quality of life improvement 40%.

For brain tumor smaller than 2 cm, with no other therapies used:
tumor shrinkage response rate is 65%.

Again, these are rough estimates by just one doctor, based on his experience, and should not be used as if they were accurate.

        Drs. Perez Garcia 1 and 2, in their work with the Oncodiagnosticator, a simple electrochemical blood analysis method, thought that they were able to detect cancer in its earliest stages, and even pre-cancerous conditions.  Whether or not their observations are corroborated, it opens the imagination to a whole new system in which minimally invasive testing can detect pre-cancer or earliest stage cancer, and a few gentle IPT treatments can restore health, as verified again by more testing.   A small preliminary study  by SGA MD, at McGill University in 1975, found no predictive value.  But the method has not, to my knowledge, been tested in any other laboratory.

Safe-Trial.

In the mean time, there is nothing to stop any doctor from treating his cancer patients with the IPT protocol right now.  It calls for exactly the same government-approved chemotherapy drugs, only in doses about 10 percent of normal.  And it uses a commonly available hormone, insulin, as a biological response modifier.  I am convinced that the only reason more doctors aren’t using it now is that they don’t know about it yet.

SGA MD has suggested that, in cases of cancer types that have a history of success with IPT, physicians should consider an IPT „safe-trial” period of about a month.  IPT would be tried first.  If rapid progress is observed, IPT would continue.  If IPT is not working, the patient could then go on to a program of today’s standard treatments.

Better chemotherapy.  

     How can IPT achieve such superb reported results, yet with small fractional doses of IPT?  We have our theories.  You can read a summary on the How IPT Works page.  And for more detailed discussion, see the patentsarticles, and protocols by Dr. SGA and the Drs. Perez Garcia.

There appear to be several predominant mechanisms at work:
        1.  Insulin makes cell membranes more permeable,
so drugs can be transported and delivered more effectively.
        2.  There are many more insulin receptors on typical cancer cells,
so more drug concentration is delivered to them.
        3.  Insulin stimulates cancer cells to begin to divide, making them
more vulnerable to many chemotherapy drugs.
        4.  Possible stimulation of immune function and elimination of toxins.
        5.  Poorly-understood improvements of blood chemistry that favor healing
and discourage cancer.

IPT for cancer can be seen simply as chemotherapy, but a more refined style of chemotherapy.  Dr. Paquette liked to use a Latin motto to describe IPT:  Non nova sed nove – „nothing new, but in a new way”.

The same injection and IV supplies are used.  And the same drugs are used; but the biological response of the body is modified to make them much more effective in much smaller, much less toxic doses.   Effectiveness is reported to be so great that IPT can be used as a primary treatment, without the need for surgery and radiation.

This whole idea of IPT may seem so radical to some doctors that they may have a hard time taking the leap of faith needed to try it, even for a brief „safe-trial” period.  But, based on the experience of other doctors, once they do, they will be very happy with the results.  IPT, when verified,  could truly be the fulfillment of chemotherapy.

Better nutrition.

So many cancer patients undergoing standard treatment look weak and malnourished, despite efforts to take supplements and eat a good diet.  This can be partly due to the nausea and lack of appetite resulting from standard treatment (anorexia), and partly due to metabolic effects of the cancer itself (cachexia).  Weight loss can be severe, and is responsible for much of the morbidity and mortality among cancer patients.

IPT avoids the nausea, and in fact stimulates a hearty appetite in patients.  It also facilitates the rapid absorption into the body of intravenous nutrients given during the IPT treatment, and of food after the IPT treatment.  See Kabadi UM et al, AIDS Patient Care STDS 2000 Nov;14(11):575-9, „Weight gain, improvement in metabolic profile, and CD4 count with insulin administration in an AIDS patient,” for a report of weight gain with daily subcutaneous insulin administration, which supports the idea that IPT could help patients gain weight, while simultaneously fighting tumors or infection.

As part of IPT cancer treatment, according to the 1992 patent, Dr. Perez Garcia 3 include substances like ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and magnesium bromide to stimulate the immune system and normalize the electrolytic balance of the body, typically deficient in magnesium in cases of cancer.  These work together with the detoxification of the body, and the potentiation of anticancer drugs in the protocol.

Other vitamins and electrolytes are also administered, depending on the doctor’s judgment.  Rapidly balancing the biochemistry in this way not only improves the health of the patient, but also apparently helps the body fight the tumors.

After an IPT treatment, patients are usually ravenously hungry.  This is a great chance for them to eat heartily and gain the weight they need.

Viral or bacterial origin?

There is growing evidence that many or most cancers may have a hidden viral or even bacterial infection as the underlying cause.  IPT has been shown to be extremely effective in treating and clearing both viral and bacterial infections, including those which are hidden in tissues and compartments of the body where normal drug treatment cannot effectively reach.  Therefore it may be found to be advantageous to include antibiotic and antiviral drugs in many cancer IPT treatments, whether or not the underlying infectious agent is known.  I call this multi-pathogen IPT (MP-IPT).    (3/5/00)

Research is needed.

It is certainly the position of IPTQ.org that IPT cancer research should be undertaken.  Lots of it.  We need to understand the mechanisms.  We need to fine tune the IPT treatment system, and document it better.  We need to see if the claims of the IPT doctors stand up in a larger clinical setting.   And eventually, I suppose, IPT will make it to the Olympics of cancer research:  multi-center multi-protocol clinical trials.  Mark my prediction:  If the IPT protocol in such a program is approved and overseen by a team of experienced IPT doctors, the experiment will be terminated for compassionate reasons after a few months when the better results of gentler IPT treatments become quite obvious.

In the mean time, patients who want this treatment now, can either go to doctors who are already trained and experienced in IPT, or can talk their own doctors into taking the training and giving this protocol a try.

Let’s get serious. 

We are talking about cancer here.  One of the leading causes of death worldwide.  It is expected to surpass heart disease as the leading cause of death in the United States, within this decade.  And in the US, 20 million new cancer cases per year are expected by 2020.  In China alone, 500,000 people die of lung cancer every year.

And we’re not just talking about cancer and people.  We’re also talking about money.  Michael Milken, in a recent talk in San Francisco, cited economists who calculated that the value of eliminating cancer would be $46 trillion.   IPT will not eliminate cancer, but it appears to promise a gentler and more effective treatment for many types of cancer, with a higher rate of complete remissions.  As such I can estimate that IPT for cancer is worth at least $5 trillion.  So  it seems to me that five million dollars invested in IPT research could yield results worth at least a thousand times more.  (See my paper about this.)   Low risk and high rewards.  Who will take up this challenge?

        In the developing world, people get cancer, too.  But they do not have the luxury of abundant medical care, nor could they afford it.  Expensive drugs, high-tech radiation, surgical suites, are all out of reach.  I recently read that millions of poor people with cancer in the developing regions die in quiet agony, for lack of treatment, and for lack of pain medications.  IPT could offer them a simple, inexpensive, low-tech therapy that uses a much smaller, and therefore more affordable, dose of chemotherapy drugs.

Information from Steven Ayre’s website: http://www.contemporarymedicine.net/;

Chemotherapy drugs are powerful cell-killing agents. In current medical practice, getting these drugs into the inside of cells where they do their work requires that they be administered in doses high enough to force them across the membranes of cancer cells.

A major drawback to this dosing strategy is a serious dose-related side effect profile frequently seen with anticancer drugs. This happens because chemotherapy agents do not discriminate between cancer cells and other normal cells in the patient’s body. They kill both kinds of cells, therefore there are side effects.

With recent advances in our understanding of the inner workings of cancer cells, it is now possible to avoid the dose-related side effects of chemotherapy, while at the same time increasing the effectiveness and specificity of these agents in killing cancer cells. The key to this is an innovative strategy for drug delivery called Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT).

Readers will recognize insulin as being the hormone used to treat diabetes. Secreted by the pancreas in healthy people, insulin is a powerful hormone with many actions in the human body, a principal one being to manage the delivery of glucose across cell membranes into cells. Insulin communicates its messages to cells by joining up with specific insulin receptors scattered on the outer surface of the cell membranes. Every cell in the human body has some of these receptors, with there being from one hundred to one hundred thousand of them per cell.

One might well ask, „What does any of this have to do with cancer cells?” It is a well-known scientific fact that cancer cells have a voracious appetite for glucose. Glucose is their unique source of energy, and because of the relatively inefficient way cancer cells burn this fuel, they use up a great deal of it. This is one reason why cancer patients lose so much weight. Because cancer cells require so much glucose, they virtually steal it away from the body’s normal cells, thus starving them.

The interesting connection between cancer cells and insulin is that recent findings published in the scientific medical literature report that cancer cells actually manufacture and secrete their own insulin. That cancer cells should be able to do this makes good sense, knowing of their requirements for large amounts of glucose to fuel their processes of uncontrolled growth. Related to this insulin secretion, and central to the operation of Insulin Potentiation Therapy, is the even more interesting fact that cancer cells have ten times more insulin receptors per cell than any of the normal cells in the body. This fact creates a valuable opportunity for the chemotherapy of cancer because it significantly differentiates normal cells from the cancerous ones.

Having ten times more insulin receptors than normal cells means that the effect of administered insulin will be ten times greater on cancer cells than on normal cells. With this difference, combined with actions of insulin in Insulin Potentiation Therapy, we are able to deliver an effective dose intensity of chemotherapy drugs to the inside of cancer cells – selectively, with a sparing of normal tissues – and this can be accomplished using greatly reduced doses of the drugs, effectively eliminating all their dose-related side effects.

There is a kind of poetic justice in this wonderful coincidence of cancer cell biology. The mechanisms that cancer cells use to kill people are the same ones manipulated in IPT to selectively potentiate chemotherapy effects in them, and to more safely and effectively kill the cancer cells. A published article about cancer cells in tissue culture reported that the addition of insulin to the culture medium enhanced the cell-killing effect of methotrexate – a commonly used chemotherapy drug – by a factor of up to ten thousand. This striking result was attributed to two effects on the cancer cells.

One was an effect of insulin to increase the trans-membrane transport of the methotrexate into the cell. The other was what the authors called „metabolic modification by insulin” within the cancer cells. There is yet another wonderful and powerful coincidence of cancer cell biology involved in this factor of „metabolic modification” – one that fits right in with the workings of Insulin Potentiation Therapy.

Just as cancer cells have their own independent secretion of insulin for unlimited access to the fuel they require, they also have their own independent secretion of something called insulin-like growth-factor to provide them with an unlimited stimulus for growth. Cancer cells also have ten times more of the receptors for insulin-like growth-factor on their cell membranes – just as for the insulin receptors.

The metabolic modification by insulin mentioned above results from the fact that not only can it join up with its own specific receptors on cell membranes, but insulin is also able to join up with the receptors for insulin-like growth-factor, and to communicate messages about growth to these cells. While it may seem highly undesirable for a cancer therapy to actually promote cancer cell growth, this is in fact a valuable effect of insulin here.

Chemotherapy side-effects result from actions on the cells of patient’s hair follicles, their bone marrow, and the cells lining the stomach and intestines. This is what causes the hair loss, low blood cell counts, and the nausea and vomiting. What these different cell types all have in common – along with cancer cells – is that they are all rapidly dividing cells.

Chemotherapy drugs like to attack rapidly dividing cells, indiscriminately. In a tumor, not all the cancer cells are in this rapidly dividing stage all at once. They take turns. When insulin joined up with the excess of insulin-like growth-factor receptors on those cancer cells in the tissue culture, it stimulated growth in many of the cells that were not in this growth phase.This „metabolic modification by insulin” rendered more of these cells susceptible to chemotherapy attack, contributing to their increased death rate as observed in the experiment.

In Insulin Potentiation Therapy, insulin administration does cause the blood glucose to go down. This is called hypoglycemia. This hypoglycemia is an anticipated side-effect of the insulin, one rapidly and effectively controllable with intravenous glucose infusions at an appropriate time, according to the IPT protocol. The principal role insulin plays in IPT is that ofa biologic response modifier. It modifies the biologic response of cancer cells in such a way that lowered doses of anticancer drugs, administered in conjunction with insulin, will kill the cancer cells more effectively. Insulin modifies the cell membrane allowing more anticancer drugs into the cell. It also modifies the growth characteristics in tumors making more of the cancer cells vulnerable to anticancer drug effects.

Due to the great excess of insulin-sensitive receptors on cancer cell membranes, we are now able to create a clear differentiation between cancer and normal cells using insulin.

Because of this important element of differentiation, along with the biologic response modification insulin produces, conventional chemotherapy drugs get targeted more specifically and more effectively inside the cancer cells only, and this can occur with the use of greatly reduced doses of these cell-killing drugs. Cancer cells die, tumors shrink, and no side-effects are caused in any other tissues. Insulin Potentiation Therapy appears to be a wonderful new way of treating cancer using nothing other than conventional chemotherapy drugs.

For more information, go to http://www.contemporarymedicine.net/ipt/ipt_main.shtml. For a list of doctors that use IPT, go to http://www.iptq.com. One pioneer of this therapy is Dr. Garcia – He has a clinic in Mexico.

bullet Articles – Published and unpublished IPT articles, scientific and popular.
bullet Documents – IPT protocols, historical documents, etc.
bullet Patents  –  Text of three US patents for insulin potentiation therapy (IPT).
bullet Bibliography  –   scientific papers that help support scientific understanding of IPT.
bullet Books –  Three complete books about IPT.  Tables of contents of others not yet scanned or translated.

 

Publications and Essays on IPT

Insulin Potentiation Therapy: A Renaissance in Cancer Chemotherapy – How Does it Work? S.G. Ayre, MD

Poster Presentation at the Third Annual Comprehensive Cancer Management Conference, Washington DC, June 2000

Hoist By One’s Own Petard. S. G. Ayre, Townsend Letter, Oct. 1999.

Insulin Shows Promise. Oncology News, 1991, 17(4): 1,7

International Congress on Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy – Paris 1991

Neoadjuvant Low-Dose Chemotherapy with Insulin in Breast Carcinomas: S.G. Ayre, Perez-Garcia y Bellon, Perez-Garcia, Jr. European Journal of Cancer. 1990. 26(11-12): 1262-3.

Blood Brain Barrier Passage of Azidothyumidine in Rats: Effects of Insulin – S.G. Ayre, B. Skaletski, A.D. Mosnaim. Research Communications in Chemical Pathology and Pharmacology. Jan. 1989. Vol. 63, No. 1.

New Approaches to Delivery of Drugs to the Brain: S.G. Ayre. Medical Hypotheses 29:283-291, 1989.

IPT: A New Concept in the Management of Chronic Degenerative Disease: S.G. Ayre, D Perez Garcia y Bellon, D. Perez Garcia, Jr. Medical Hypotheses. 20(2): 199-210, 1986.

The Physiology and Clinical Pharmacology of Insulin in its Application in Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT): S.G. Ayre, MD

Insulin Potentiation Therapy – A Renaissance in Cancer Chemotherapy: Steven G. Ayre, MD

Low dose chemotherapy in combination with insulin for the treatment of metastatic tumors: C. Damyanov, M. Radoslavova, V. Gavrilov, D. Stoeva. Medical Center of Integrative Medicine, Sofia, Bulgaria. Journal of BUON 14: 711-15, 2009.

Insulin Potentiation Therapy in the treatment of malignant neoplastic diseases: a three year study: Ch. Damyanov, MD, PhD, D. Gerasimova, MD, D. Stoeva, MD, D. Dyukmedzhieva, MD. Medical Center of Integrative Medicine, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Supportive Studies – Published clinical and in-vitro studies that support the use of  insulin as a biologic response modifier.

Metabolic Modification by Insulin Enhances Methotrexate Cytotoxicity in MCF-7 Human Breast Cells. Alabaster, O. Vonderhaar, B. and Shafie, S. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. Vol 17, No. 11, pp 1223-1228. 1961. 

Insulin treatment in cancer cachexia: effects on survival, metabolism, and
physical functioning. Lundholm K, Körner U, Gunnebo L, Sixt-Ammilon P, Fouladiun M, Daneryd P, Bosaeus I. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 May 1;13(9):2699 706.

Long-Term Effect of Diabetes and Its Treatment on Cognitive Function. Jacobson, Alan, et.al. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1842-52.

Preclinical safety and antitumor efficacy of insulin combined with irradiation. Bénédicte F. Jordan, Nelson Beghein, Nathalie Crokart, Christine Baudelet, Vincent Gregoire, Bernard Gallez. Radiotherapy and Oncology 81 (2006) 112–117.

Insulin-induced enhancement of antitumoral response to methotrexate in breast cancer patients. Lasalvio-Prisco, Eduardo, et.al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2004) 53: 220–224.

The effect of insulin on chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity in human esophageal and lung cancer cells. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Feb 10;83(3):195-7. 

Pretreatment with insulin enhances anticancer functions of 5-fluorouracil in human esophageal and colonic cancer cells. Zou K, Ju JH, Xie H. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2007 May; 28(5):721-30. 

Periodical Publications on Dr. Ayre and IPT

Chicago Magazine. The New Docs. January 2005.

A New Approach to Cancer Care – Middendorf, Bobbye. Conscious Choice. April 2001, Vol. 14 No. 4, 28-29.

Chitwood finds strength in physician’s alternatives. Kendra L. Williams. Downers Grove Progress. Sept. 22, 2000.

Doctor to practice alternative methods for treating cancer – Kenneth Patchen. Antioch News. July 31, 1997. P A7.

Local Doctor develops treatments for cancer – Brian Murphy. Tom Tom (newspaper of Antioch Community High School, Antioch, IL). May 24, 1996

Doctor Researches Lifesaving Applications for an old drug. Mary Catherine Rhedin. Lakeland Newspapers, December 7, 1990. Pp 13-14.

History of IPT

A Brief History of IPT – Steven G. Ayre, MD

Chronology of Events in the Scientific Evaluation and Development of IPT

Documents of Historical Interest

FDA Drug Bulletin, April 1982

Personal Essays from Dr. Ayre

Managing Malignancy: Our Answer to Cancer 

My Medical Opinion

Developing a Spirit of Achievement

Healing Ourselves

Prayer

Psychoneuroimmunology and the Future of Medicine. S.G. Ayre, Townsend Letter, Nov. 1988.

Let’s Do Part to Cure Ills of Society. S.G. Ayre, American Medical News, Feb. 17, 1989.

MDs Must be Participants in Evolution of Medicine. S.G. Ayre, American Medical News, March 25, 1988.

Science Must Embrace Human Need. S.G. Ayre, American Medical News.

Too Bad Society Not Ready for Ideals. S. G. Ayre, American Medical News, Nov. 27, 1987.

Best of health!

Cristian Gologan

SHARE,LIKE, comments -BUTTONS BELOW!

Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT).

CLICK AICI pentru  limba ROmana(traducerea „aproximativa” utilizand google translate).

For those of you still interested in an more effective form of chemotherapy (about 10 times more effective), safer – using less chemo drugs(about 10 times the standard chemo doze) thus, without the major side effects of chemotherapy here is an article about   IPT(Insulin Potentiation Therapy), a technique that gets chemo drugs directly into cancer cells ( about 10 times more inside cancer cells than in normal cells,to be more specific)  .

Though IPT is not  detailed  in my book, I’ ve contacted  Annie Brandt , Founder & Executive Director ,BEst Answer for Cancer Foundation ,  „Thriving While Surviving”  , A Whole-Being Healing Platform + Targeted Cancer Therapies = Integrative Oncology , www.bestanswerforcancer.org and  http://www.iptforcancer.com/ and am waiting for their review and updates as well (as mentioned in previousposts, I am alos waiting for reviews and updates from the Gerson Institute – run by Charlotte Gerson , daughter of Dr. Gerson , The Metabolic  Institute  – coordinated by the son of l Dr William Kelley , Issels clinic –  coordinated by wife of  Dr Iosef Issels, Hope4Cancer clinic  ICRF Inc,  cancertutor and others.I’ll let you know about the institutes centers and clinics this site officially endorses and is endorsed by officially ( mutual support including  and exchangeof knowledge and experience)

Cancer chemotherapy
without major side effects.

Gentle cancer treatment
without trauma.

Infectious disease treatment:  faster and more effective.
Could fight drug resistance.

Available to patients today, with no need to wait years for government (FDA) approval.

More than 70 years of  successful use.   

With IPT, regular drugs act like „super” drugs, for treatment of many different diseases.

These are observations that some IPT doctors have reported for many years.

Supported by scientific papers, and reports from many doctors.  However, despite more than 140 years of cumulative reported IPT success, and billions of dollars spent on other medical research, no clinical or laboratory research on IPT has been done or funded… yet.

IPT deserves laboratory studies and clinical trials.

„The second discovery of insulin.” ™

IPT is insulin potentiation therapy, a non-diabetic use of the hormone insulin to dramatically improve effectiveness and delivery of standard medications.
IPT has an outstanding 135 doctor-year track record (115 years for cancer) over 72 years, and is ready for clinical trials and widespread use.

Donato Perez Garcia MD and IPT patientCancer treatment with IPTis reported to be gentler, safer, more effective, and less expensive, with no surgery, no radiation, and usually no side effects. 

Breakthrough results have also been reported for arthritis, as well as for infectious, respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, and other diseases.

This slight modification of standard medicine could help many medications act like super drugs, with better results for many millions of patients.  The US National Institutes of Health has expressed interest in clinical trials of IPT for cancer, but has so far provided no funding. 

Donato Perez Garcia MD (1896-1971), discoverer of IPTIPT is 21st century medicine. Donato Perez Garcia y Bellon MD (1930-2000)Discovered in 1926 by Donato Perez Garcia MD, fostered by his son and grandson, with 140+ doctor-years of experience over 72 years, yet still unknown by the world, IPT is just starting a scientific and clinical rebirth.

    IPT =  Insulin Potentiation Therapy
=  Quest, Questions, Quality, Cue, and Queue. 

„The second discovery of insulin” ™

IPTQ lifeboat logo, with IPT on side, and Q-shaped life ring

IPTQ News

First IPT clinical trial datapublished December 4, 2003.  IPT significantly improved outcomes for advanced breast cancer patients. 

Chinese lab data  published Feb. 2003 show that insulin significantly increases tumor cell killing effect of three chemotherapy drugs on esophageal and lung cancer cell lines.

IPT doctors are now listed on
GetIPT.com

IPT Training Workshops forDoctors.  Information on GetIPT.com  or  email for info

Historic 1976 IPT paper now available on IPTQ.com. (10/19/03)

„Treating Cancer with IPT”,
 IPT book, by Ross (MD) and Marion Hauser (MS, RD), is now available.  

Dr. Perez Garcia, Dr. SGA, and IPTQ webhost C. Duffield received 
The Caring Pioneer Award
 at the gala release event in Chicago.

Historic Polio movie shows IPTsuccesses in the 1950s.

Case study of Laurie Shaw, survivor of breast cancer with metastases.  „…cancer free, healthy, strong, and whole.”

Cellular Therapy, a historical book by Donato Perez Garcia (1), in a new English translation by Aime Ricci, is now available publicly for the first time, on IPTQ.com.

IPT training:  Dr. Perez Garcia watches Dr. HauserIPT training for physicians is available now, in a workshop in the US, or privately in the clinics of Dr. Perez Garcia or Dr. SGA.  

IPT is available now from
almost 80 doctors worldwide,   

in 8 countries: the US,  Canada, Mexico,  Argentina, Brazil, France, Switzerland, Venezuelaand  Ecuador.  Also one veterinarian in Arizona.  

Anthrax and bioterrorism – Could IPT be a better and faster treatment for serious bacterial and viral infections?  Research urgently needed.

IPT presented to the US NIHseveral times, but so far without results.

Six books about IPT, an IPTQ exclusive.

Interview with Donato Perez Garcia MD 3.

IPT slide show, updated.

Letters about IPT to and from public figures.

Details and more news…

Web-Stat hit counter
Number of website visitors
since August 2002
(Click on box for detailed statistics)

What people have said about IPT:

„I feel like I am the recipient of a miracle.  I feel a gratitude that words will never express.” – former IPT patient Donna McDermott .

„IPT needs to be the treatment of choice with chemo. There should be no question about that. For everyone, especially children, the risks and side effects are so much less than with regular administration of chemo.” – Susan Holder, nurse and mother of a child with cancer.

„I am honored to be an instructor in IPT and must  thank you again and again for not only changing my life but life of all my  past, present and future patients…you [Dr. Donato Perez Garcia] and your father and grandfather are great men, there is no doubt.”
–an IPT physician and instructor

„Medicine of Hope”   – JC Paquette MD
„Medicine of Dreams”   – C Duffield PhD 

„Your ideas about making standard drugs work better are interesting….”  – former US President Bill Clinton 

„IPT is a weapon of mass benevolence.”
  –C Duffield PhD  

Cancer and IPT

IPTLD: Targeting the Cancer Cells… Not the Patient!™

Insulin Potentiation Targeted Low Dose therapy (IPTLD) is a procedure for targeting chemotherapeutic drugs directly to cancer cells, making the drugs tougher on the disease and easier on the rest of the body.

Conventional chemotherapy tends to flood the body with drugs so enough will enter the cancer cells to kill them. Each of our trillions of cells has a membrane, an outer skin, that protects it from toxins. Standard chemotherapy must be given in large enough quantities to force penetration through that membrane.

IPTLD, however, penetrates easily through the cell membrane because it goes in hand-in-hand with sugar (glucose). Cancer cells, unlike healthy cells, need lots of glucose for fuel. Without it, they die. The membrane of a cancer cell is designed to take in a lot more glucose than healthy cells. In medical parlance we say cancer cells are equipped with many more insulin receptors. So, what if we pair a small dose of chemo drugs with the glucose? Yes, the cancer cell takes in the chemotherapy drugs in its effort to get at the sugar. Using insulin allows us to differentiate the cancer cells from the normal cells. This is a significant advantage.

How does IPT actually work?

When a doctor administers IPTLD, the first thing he or she does is to gently lower the patient’s blood sugar level with insulin, the same natural hormone diabetics use. The cancer cells, because they must have sugar to live, become ravenous and open those insulin receptors wide to get at whatever they can find in the blood stream’s diminishing supply. When the blood sugar level has dropped enough, the doctor will administer a low dose of chemotherapy. The cancer cells take it in. The doctor then administers glucose which brings the patient’s blood sugar level back up to normal.

Because insulin assists in the delivery of the drugs, IPTLD uses about 90% less chemotherapy compared to conventional oncology. This means that patients continue to thrive, maintain their lifestyle, and be vital while the cancer is eradicated.

Insulin helps us in another way. Chemo is most effective when it connects with a cancer cell as it is dividing because cells are most vulnerable at that phase in their life cycle. Insulin prompts cancer cells to divide – it is thought that insulin is able to prompt cell division  at what is called the “therapeutic moment,” the moment when the doctor determines the blood sugar level has dropped enough and the chemotherapy is administered. Thus, insulin helps us deliver chemo when more cells are most vulnerable.

The cells that turn over the fastest in the human body – the ones most likely to be dividing at any one time – are in the intestine, in our mouths, and hair follicles. That is why the side effects with conventional chemo cause people to go bald and often lead to mouth and stomach ulcers, and organ failure. Without insulin, the conventional large dose of chemotherapy attacks whatever cancer cells happen to be dividing, plus the other rapidly dividing cells in the body of which there are many.

What are the benefits of IPTLD?

  • IPTLD can be very tough on tumors while being very gentle for the patient who continues to live a normal, vital lifestyle while being treated.
  • Using insulin allows us to differentiate the cancer cell population from the normal cell population. That means a lower dose of chemotherapy can be used and this is important since these drugs have considerable toxicity associated with them.
  • IPTLD reduces chemotherapy side effects in normal cells.
  • IPTLD enhances chemotherapy’s killing effectiveness in cancer cells. A 1981 study found that using insulin increased the killing effect of the chemo drug methotrexate by a factor of 10,000, for example.[1]
  • Gentle treatment and the use of complementary therapies to strengthen the immune system is our body’s best natural defense against the return of cancer. View additionalComplementary Therapies.
  • IPTLD treatments cost significantly less than conventional chemo.

STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY VS. IPT LowDose

Effect Standard Chemotherapy IPTLD
Aggressively kills cancer Y Y
Hair Loss Y Mild or none
Nausea Y Mild or none
Loss of Appetite/Anorexia Y Mild or none
Diarrhea Y N
Reproductive Organs Effected/Sterility Y N
Ultimate Increase of MDM2 Leading to Depletion of p53 Gene Y N
Immune System is Damaged Y N
Cancer is strengthened Y N
Severe Physical & Mental Fatigue Y N
Healthy Cells DNA Distortion Making Y N
Them Pre-Cancerous Y N
Thrombocytopenia Y N
Anemia Y Mild or none
Infections Y Mild or none
Neutropenia Y N
Emotional Side Effects Y N
Chemo Brain side effect Y N

What cancers respond to IPTLD?

IPTLD has been reported to work especially well for breast, prostate, lung, colon, stomach cancers, lymphoma, and melanoma. There are also reports of IPTLD bringing responses and remissions to patients with some very difficult cancers, including pancreatic, ovarian, and renal cell cancers. Other cancers successfully treated are blood, bone, cervical, esophageal, lip, mouth, neck, small intestines, testicular, throat, thyroid, uterine and vaginal.

Why doesn’t my regular oncologist use IPTLD?

IPTLD uses only about 10% to 15% of the pharmaceutical drugs used in traditional chemotherapy. Understandably, the pharmaceutical industry has been slow to encourage doctors to use less of their product. Medical school curriculum is still focused on insulin’s use in diabetes.

Credit for the discovery of insulin in 1921 goes to Dr. Frederick Banting, a Canadian surgeon. In the early 1930s, Dr. Donato Perez Garcia, a Mexican surgeon, discovered that giving insulin to a patient would allow more antibiotic drugs to penetrate the blood brain barrier. In the 1940s, he discovered that the same technique would allow more chemotherapeutic drugs to enter cancer cells, thus opening the way for targeted chemotherapeutic treatments that do not damage nearly as many healthy cells.

IPTLD has been used for cancer worldwide since 1946; it has been used in the United States since 1997.

View PDF: How I Deal With My Cancer? By Dr. Donato Perez Garcia

NOTE: The Best Answer for Cancer Foundation is not, in any way, associated with Dr. Donato Perez Garcia.

[1]Alabaster, A; Vonderhaar, B; Shafie S. Metabolic modification by insulin enhances methotrexate cytotoxicity in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 17:1223-1228

Rewriting the Book of Oncology  ™

„I treat patients; I do not treat cancer.”  – Dr. Perez Garcia 3

Joy, not despair.

Cancer is one of the most successful applications of insulin potentiation therapy (IPT).  This method was first used to treat cancer in 1945, by Dr. Perez Garcia 1, and has been used with very good results by all the IPT doctors since.

The treatment of cancer patients with IPT is, it appears, harmless at worst, and spectacular at best.   If cancer is caught early enough (which can be rather advanced), and if there is a chemotherapy drug or combination that has been found effective, complete remission with IPT is a very common occurrence.  And all this without surgery, radiation, or major side effects.   IPT cancer patients often feel (and look) better from the first treatment on, and often appear lively and enthusiastic.  Even if IPT does not achieve complete remission, it  generally helps relieve symptoms and pain, and improves quality of life for the days that remain to the patient.  And at worst, reminiscent of of the Hippocratic Oath, it does no harm.

Once when I was visiting Dr. Perez Garcia 3 in his office, he showed me a follow-up CAT scan of one of his cancer patients, now in complete remission.  Although there was absolutely no trace of tumors on the images, the radiologist, knowing the patient’s history, had apparently felt obliged to write that the tumors were now „almost invisible”.  Donato laughed, „Yes, I am the doctor who can make your tumors ‘almost invisible’ … for the rest of your life!”

Wouldn’t every oncologist in the world like to have a tool that would allow him to joke with such joy?

Instead, oncology today offers a great deal of hope, but only after guiding the patient through a grim battlefield of mutilation (surgery), burning (radiation), and/or poisoning („normal” or high dose chemotherapy).  Grim side effects are accepted as common, likely, often inevitable, and are dealt with as well as possible:  surgical scars and adhesions, hair loss, weight loss, nausea, sterility, immune system depression, and secondary infections.  Survival for five years is considered a „cure”, no matter how much damage has been done to the patient’s general health.  And the sad reality is that a large fraction of patients who die of cancer „complications” actually die from the side effects of treatment.  (My own father certainly did.)

No wonder a new diagnosis of cancer is usually such a big shock to a patient.  Cancer diagnosis often triggers strong negative reactions in many people:  shame, horror, fatalism.  IPT could provide new hope.  If cancer is detected early, the IPT protocol appears to offer a good chance for complete remission without major negative side effects.

It seems almost too easy.  My guess is that, even after IPT becomes proven, there will still be people who choose the former standard methods, under the misimpression that more suffering will bring better results.  But the majority of patients will be overjoyed to go with a gentler, safer therapy.

While no statistics have been reported for IPT success rates for various cancer types, here is a rough estimate given by Dr. Perez Garcia 3 in an email, based on his years of experience.   To summarize:

For tumor less than 4 cm, and no other therapies (chemo, radiation) have been used:
full remission rate 95%.

For tumor greater than 4 cm,  and no other therapies used:
full remission rate 80%.

For recurrence/metastasis after other therapies were used:
full remission rate 25%, partial remission rate 70%, quality of life improvement 98%.

For terminally ill patients, with no liver impairment:
quality of life improvement 40%.

For brain tumor smaller than 2 cm, with no other therapies used:
tumor shrinkage response rate is 65%.

Again, these are rough estimates by just one doctor, based on his experience, and should not be used as if they were accurate.

        Drs. Perez Garcia 1 and 2, in their work with the Oncodiagnosticator, a simple electrochemical blood analysis method, thought that they were able to detect cancer in its earliest stages, and even pre-cancerous conditions.  Whether or not their observations are corroborated, it opens the imagination to a whole new system in which minimally invasive testing can detect pre-cancer or earliest stage cancer, and a few gentle IPT treatments can restore health, as verified again by more testing.   A small preliminary study  by SGA MD, at McGill University in 1975, found no predictive value.  But the method has not, to my knowledge, been tested in any other laboratory.

Safe-Trial.

In the mean time, there is nothing to stop any doctor from treating his cancer patients with the IPT protocol right now.  It calls for exactly the same government-approved chemotherapy drugs, only in doses about 10 percent of normal.  And it uses a commonly available hormone, insulin, as a biological response modifier.  I am convinced that the only reason more doctors aren’t using it now is that they don’t know about it yet.

SGA MD has suggested that, in cases of cancer types that have a history of success with IPT, physicians should consider an IPT „safe-trial” period of about a month.  IPT would be tried first.  If rapid progress is observed, IPT would continue.  If IPT is not working, the patient could then go on to a program of today’s standard treatments.

Better chemotherapy.  

     How can IPT achieve such superb reported results, yet with small fractional doses of IPT?  We have our theories.  You can read a summary on the How IPT Works page.  And for more detailed discussion, see the patentsarticles, and protocols by Dr. SGA and the Drs. Perez Garcia.

There appear to be several predominant mechanisms at work:
        1.  Insulin makes cell membranes more permeable,
so drugs can be transported and delivered more effectively.
        2.  There are many more insulin receptors on typical cancer cells,
so more drug concentration is delivered to them.
        3.  Insulin stimulates cancer cells to begin to divide, making them
more vulnerable to many chemotherapy drugs.
        4.  Possible stimulation of immune function and elimination of toxins.
        5.  Poorly-understood improvements of blood chemistry that favor healing
and discourage cancer.

IPT for cancer can be seen simply as chemotherapy, but a more refined style of chemotherapy.  Dr. Paquette liked to use a Latin motto to describe IPT:  Non nova sed nove – „nothing new, but in a new way”.

The same injection and IV supplies are used.  And the same drugs are used; but the biological response of the body is modified to make them much more effective in much smaller, much less toxic doses.   Effectiveness is reported to be so great that IPT can be used as a primary treatment, without the need for surgery and radiation.

This whole idea of IPT may seem so radical to some doctors that they may have a hard time taking the leap of faith needed to try it, even for a brief „safe-trial” period.  But, based on the experience of other doctors, once they do, they will be very happy with the results.  IPT, when verified,  could truly be the fulfillment of chemotherapy.

Better nutrition.

So many cancer patients undergoing standard treatment look weak and malnourished, despite efforts to take supplements and eat a good diet.  This can be partly due to the nausea and lack of appetite resulting from standard treatment (anorexia), and partly due to metabolic effects of the cancer itself (cachexia).  Weight loss can be severe, and is responsible for much of the morbidity and mortality among cancer patients.

IPT avoids the nausea, and in fact stimulates a hearty appetite in patients.  It also facilitates the rapid absorption into the body of intravenous nutrients given during the IPT treatment, and of food after the IPT treatment.  See Kabadi UM et al, AIDS Patient Care STDS 2000 Nov;14(11):575-9, „Weight gain, improvement in metabolic profile, and CD4 count with insulin administration in an AIDS patient,” for a report of weight gain with daily subcutaneous insulin administration, which supports the idea that IPT could help patients gain weight, while simultaneously fighting tumors or infection.

As part of IPT cancer treatment, according to the 1992 patent, Dr. Perez Garcia 3 include substances like ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and magnesium bromide to stimulate the immune system and normalize the electrolytic balance of the body, typically deficient in magnesium in cases of cancer.  These work together with the detoxification of the body, and the potentiation of anticancer drugs in the protocol.

Other vitamins and electrolytes are also administered, depending on the doctor’s judgment.  Rapidly balancing the biochemistry in this way not only improves the health of the patient, but also apparently helps the body fight the tumors.

After an IPT treatment, patients are usually ravenously hungry.  This is a great chance for them to eat heartily and gain the weight they need.

Viral or bacterial origin?

There is growing evidence that many or most cancers may have a hidden viral or even bacterial infection as the underlying cause.  IPT has been shown to be extremely effective in treating and clearing both viral and bacterial infections, including those which are hidden in tissues and compartments of the body where normal drug treatment cannot effectively reach.  Therefore it may be found to be advantageous to include antibiotic and antiviral drugs in many cancer IPT treatments, whether or not the underlying infectious agent is known.  I call this multi-pathogen IPT (MP-IPT).    (3/5/00)

Research is needed.

It is certainly the position of IPTQ.org that IPT cancer research should be undertaken.  Lots of it.  We need to understand the mechanisms.  We need to fine tune the IPT treatment system, and document it better.  We need to see if the claims of the IPT doctors stand up in a larger clinical setting.   And eventually, I suppose, IPT will make it to the Olympics of cancer research:  multi-center multi-protocol clinical trials.  Mark my prediction:  If the IPT protocol in such a program is approved and overseen by a team of experienced IPT doctors, the experiment will be terminated for compassionate reasons after a few months when the better results of gentler IPT treatments become quite obvious.

In the mean time, patients who want this treatment now, can either go to doctors who are already trained and experienced in IPT, or can talk their own doctors into taking the training and giving this protocol a try.

Let’s get serious. 

We are talking about cancer here.  One of the leading causes of death worldwide.  It is expected to surpass heart disease as the leading cause of death in the United States, within this decade.  And in the US, 20 million new cancer cases per year are expected by 2020.  In China alone, 500,000 people die of lung cancer every year.

And we’re not just talking about cancer and people.  We’re also talking about money.  Michael Milken, in a recent talk in San Francisco, cited economists who calculated that the value of eliminating cancer would be $46 trillion.   IPT will not eliminate cancer, but it appears to promise a gentler and more effective treatment for many types of cancer, with a higher rate of complete remissions.  As such I can estimate that IPT for cancer is worth at least $5 trillion.  So  it seems to me that five million dollars invested in IPT research could yield results worth at least a thousand times more.  (See my paper about this.)   Low risk and high rewards.  Who will take up this challenge?

        In the developing world, people get cancer, too.  But they do not have the luxury of abundant medical care, nor could they afford it.  Expensive drugs, high-tech radiation, surgical suites, are all out of reach.  I recently read that millions of poor people with cancer in the developing regions die in quiet agony, for lack of treatment, and for lack of pain medications.  IPT could offer them a simple, inexpensive, low-tech therapy that uses a much smaller, and therefore more affordable, dose of chemotherapy drugs.

Information from Steven Ayre’s website: http://www.contemporarymedicine.net/;

Chemotherapy drugs are powerful cell-killing agents. In current medical practice, getting these drugs into the inside of cells where they do their work requires that they be administered in doses high enough to force them across the membranes of cancer cells.

A major drawback to this dosing strategy is a serious dose-related side effect profile frequently seen with anticancer drugs. This happens because chemotherapy agents do not discriminate between cancer cells and other normal cells in the patient’s body. They kill both kinds of cells, therefore there are side effects.

With recent advances in our understanding of the inner workings of cancer cells, it is now possible to avoid the dose-related side effects of chemotherapy, while at the same time increasing the effectiveness and specificity of these agents in killing cancer cells. The key to this is an innovative strategy for drug delivery called Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT).

Readers will recognize insulin as being the hormone used to treat diabetes. Secreted by the pancreas in healthy people, insulin is a powerful hormone with many actions in the human body, a principal one being to manage the delivery of glucose across cell membranes into cells. Insulin communicates its messages to cells by joining up with specific insulin receptors scattered on the outer surface of the cell membranes. Every cell in the human body has some of these receptors, with there being from one hundred to one hundred thousand of them per cell.

One might well ask, „What does any of this have to do with cancer cells?” It is a well-known scientific fact that cancer cells have a voracious appetite for glucose. Glucose is their unique source of energy, and because of the relatively inefficient way cancer cells burn this fuel, they use up a great deal of it. This is one reason why cancer patients lose so much weight. Because cancer cells require so much glucose, they virtually steal it away from the body’s normal cells, thus starving them.

The interesting connection between cancer cells and insulin is that recent findings published in the scientific medical literature report that cancer cells actually manufacture and secrete their own insulin. That cancer cells should be able to do this makes good sense, knowing of their requirements for large amounts of glucose to fuel their processes of uncontrolled growth. Related to this insulin secretion, and central to the operation of Insulin Potentiation Therapy, is the even more interesting fact that cancer cells have ten times more insulin receptors per cell than any of the normal cells in the body. This fact creates a valuable opportunity for the chemotherapy of cancer because it significantly differentiates normal cells from the cancerous ones.

Having ten times more insulin receptors than normal cells means that the effect of administered insulin will be ten times greater on cancer cells than on normal cells. With this difference, combined with actions of insulin in Insulin Potentiation Therapy, we are able to deliver an effective dose intensity of chemotherapy drugs to the inside of cancer cells – selectively, with a sparing of normal tissues – and this can be accomplished using greatly reduced doses of the drugs, effectively eliminating all their dose-related side effects.

There is a kind of poetic justice in this wonderful coincidence of cancer cell biology. The mechanisms that cancer cells use to kill people are the same ones manipulated in IPT to selectively potentiate chemotherapy effects in them, and to more safely and effectively kill the cancer cells. A published article about cancer cells in tissue culture reported that the addition of insulin to the culture medium enhanced the cell-killing effect of methotrexate – a commonly used chemotherapy drug – by a factor of up to ten thousand. This striking result was attributed to two effects on the cancer cells.

One was an effect of insulin to increase the trans-membrane transport of the methotrexate into the cell. The other was what the authors called „metabolic modification by insulin” within the cancer cells. There is yet another wonderful and powerful coincidence of cancer cell biology involved in this factor of „metabolic modification” – one that fits right in with the workings of Insulin Potentiation Therapy.

Just as cancer cells have their own independent secretion of insulin for unlimited access to the fuel they require, they also have their own independent secretion of something called insulin-like growth-factor to provide them with an unlimited stimulus for growth. Cancer cells also have ten times more of the receptors for insulin-like growth-factor on their cell membranes – just as for the insulin receptors.

The metabolic modification by insulin mentioned above results from the fact that not only can it join up with its own specific receptors on cell membranes, but insulin is also able to join up with the receptors for insulin-like growth-factor, and to communicate messages about growth to these cells. While it may seem highly undesirable for a cancer therapy to actually promote cancer cell growth, this is in fact a valuable effect of insulin here.

Chemotherapy side-effects result from actions on the cells of patient’s hair follicles, their bone marrow, and the cells lining the stomach and intestines. This is what causes the hair loss, low blood cell counts, and the nausea and vomiting. What these different cell types all have in common – along with cancer cells – is that they are all rapidly dividing cells.

Chemotherapy drugs like to attack rapidly dividing cells, indiscriminately. In a tumor, not all the cancer cells are in this rapidly dividing stage all at once. They take turns. When insulin joined up with the excess of insulin-like growth-factor receptors on those cancer cells in the tissue culture, it stimulated growth in many of the cells that were not in this growth phase.This „metabolic modification by insulin” rendered more of these cells susceptible to chemotherapy attack, contributing to their increased death rate as observed in the experiment.

In Insulin Potentiation Therapy, insulin administration does cause the blood glucose to go down. This is called hypoglycemia. This hypoglycemia is an anticipated side-effect of the insulin, one rapidly and effectively controllable with intravenous glucose infusions at an appropriate time, according to the IPT protocol. The principal role insulin plays in IPT is that ofa biologic response modifier. It modifies the biologic response of cancer cells in such a way that lowered doses of anticancer drugs, administered in conjunction with insulin, will kill the cancer cells more effectively. Insulin modifies the cell membrane allowing more anticancer drugs into the cell. It also modifies the growth characteristics in tumors making more of the cancer cells vulnerable to anticancer drug effects.

Due to the great excess of insulin-sensitive receptors on cancer cell membranes, we are now able to create a clear differentiation between cancer and normal cells using insulin.

Because of this important element of differentiation, along with the biologic response modification insulin produces, conventional chemotherapy drugs get targeted more specifically and more effectively inside the cancer cells only, and this can occur with the use of greatly reduced doses of these cell-killing drugs. Cancer cells die, tumors shrink, and no side-effects are caused in any other tissues. Insulin Potentiation Therapy appears to be a wonderful new way of treating cancer using nothing other than conventional chemotherapy drugs.

For more information, go to http://www.contemporarymedicine.net/ipt/ipt_main.shtml. For a list of doctors that use IPT, go to http://www.iptq.com. One pioneer of this therapy is Dr. Garcia – He has a clinic in Mexico.

bullet Articles – Published and unpublished IPT articles, scientific and popular.
bullet Documents – IPT protocols, historical documents, etc.
bullet Patents  –  Text of three US patents for insulin potentiation therapy (IPT).
bullet Bibliography  –   scientific papers that help support scientific understanding of IPT.
bullet Books –  Three complete books about IPT.  Tables of contents of others not yet scanned or translated.

 

Publications and Essays on IPT

Insulin Potentiation Therapy: A Renaissance in Cancer Chemotherapy – How Does it Work? S.G. Ayre, MD

Poster Presentation at the Third Annual Comprehensive Cancer Management Conference, Washington DC, June 2000

Hoist By One’s Own Petard. S. G. Ayre, Townsend Letter, Oct. 1999.

Insulin Shows Promise. Oncology News, 1991, 17(4): 1,7

International Congress on Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy – Paris 1991

Neoadjuvant Low-Dose Chemotherapy with Insulin in Breast Carcinomas: S.G. Ayre, Perez-Garcia y Bellon, Perez-Garcia, Jr. European Journal of Cancer. 1990. 26(11-12): 1262-3.

Blood Brain Barrier Passage of Azidothyumidine in Rats: Effects of Insulin – S.G. Ayre, B. Skaletski, A.D. Mosnaim. Research Communications in Chemical Pathology and Pharmacology. Jan. 1989. Vol. 63, No. 1.

New Approaches to Delivery of Drugs to the Brain: S.G. Ayre. Medical Hypotheses 29:283-291, 1989.

IPT: A New Concept in the Management of Chronic Degenerative Disease: S.G. Ayre, D Perez Garcia y Bellon, D. Perez Garcia, Jr. Medical Hypotheses. 20(2): 199-210, 1986.

The Physiology and Clinical Pharmacology of Insulin in its Application in Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT): S.G. Ayre, MD

Insulin Potentiation Therapy – A Renaissance in Cancer Chemotherapy: Steven G. Ayre, MD

Low dose chemotherapy in combination with insulin for the treatment of metastatic tumors: C. Damyanov, M. Radoslavova, V. Gavrilov, D. Stoeva. Medical Center of Integrative Medicine, Sofia, Bulgaria. Journal of BUON 14: 711-15, 2009.

Insulin Potentiation Therapy in the treatment of malignant neoplastic diseases: a three year study: Ch. Damyanov, MD, PhD, D. Gerasimova, MD, D. Stoeva, MD, D. Dyukmedzhieva, MD. Medical Center of Integrative Medicine, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Supportive Studies – Published clinical and in-vitro studies that support the use of  insulin as a biologic response modifier.

Metabolic Modification by Insulin Enhances Methotrexate Cytotoxicity in MCF-7 Human Breast Cells. Alabaster, O. Vonderhaar, B. and Shafie, S. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. Vol 17, No. 11, pp 1223-1228. 1961. 

Insulin treatment in cancer cachexia: effects on survival, metabolism, and
physical functioning. Lundholm K, Körner U, Gunnebo L, Sixt-Ammilon P, Fouladiun M, Daneryd P, Bosaeus I. Clin Cancer Res. 2007 May 1;13(9):2699 706.

Long-Term Effect of Diabetes and Its Treatment on Cognitive Function. Jacobson, Alan, et.al. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1842-52.

Preclinical safety and antitumor efficacy of insulin combined with irradiation. Bénédicte F. Jordan, Nelson Beghein, Nathalie Crokart, Christine Baudelet, Vincent Gregoire, Bernard Gallez. Radiotherapy and Oncology 81 (2006) 112–117.

Insulin-induced enhancement of antitumoral response to methotrexate in breast cancer patients. Lasalvio-Prisco, Eduardo, et.al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2004) 53: 220–224.

The effect of insulin on chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity in human esophageal and lung cancer cells. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Feb 10;83(3):195-7. 

Pretreatment with insulin enhances anticancer functions of 5-fluorouracil in human esophageal and colonic cancer cells. Zou K, Ju JH, Xie H. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2007 May; 28(5):721-30. 

Periodical Publications on Dr. Ayre and IPT

Chicago Magazine. The New Docs. January 2005.

A New Approach to Cancer Care – Middendorf, Bobbye. Conscious Choice. April 2001, Vol. 14 No. 4, 28-29.

Chitwood finds strength in physician’s alternatives. Kendra L. Williams. Downers Grove Progress. Sept. 22, 2000.

Doctor to practice alternative methods for treating cancer – Kenneth Patchen. Antioch News. July 31, 1997. P A7.

Local Doctor develops treatments for cancer – Brian Murphy. Tom Tom (newspaper of Antioch Community High School, Antioch, IL). May 24, 1996

Doctor Researches Lifesaving Applications for an old drug. Mary Catherine Rhedin. Lakeland Newspapers, December 7, 1990. Pp 13-14.

History of IPT

A Brief History of IPT – Steven G. Ayre, MD

Chronology of Events in the Scientific Evaluation and Development of IPT

Documents of Historical Interest

FDA Drug Bulletin, April 1982

Personal Essays from Dr. Ayre

Managing Malignancy: Our Answer to Cancer 

My Medical Opinion

Developing a Spirit of Achievement

Healing Ourselves

Prayer

Psychoneuroimmunology and the Future of Medicine. S.G. Ayre, Townsend Letter, Nov. 1988.

Let’s Do Part to Cure Ills of Society. S.G. Ayre, American Medical News, Feb. 17, 1989.

MDs Must be Participants in Evolution of Medicine. S.G. Ayre, American Medical News, March 25, 1988.

Science Must Embrace Human Need. S.G. Ayre, American Medical News.

Too Bad Society Not Ready for Ideals. S. G. Ayre, American Medical News, Nov. 27, 1987.

Best of health!

Cristian Gologan

SHARE,LIKE, comments -BUTTONS BELOW!

Scientific studies DATABASE PAGE 3

CLICK AICI pt. limba ROmana

Algae / Seaweed : Spirulina, Chlorella, Kombu(Fucoidan), etc.

 

  • Chlorella :

http://www.canceractive.com/cancer-active-page-link.aspx?n=533

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/wellbeing/6028408/Chlorella-the-superfood-that-helps-fight-disease.html

http://chlorellagrowthfactor.co.uk/research-on-cgf/

Chlorella used as an adjunct supplement during radiation treatment for cancer.

http://www.naturalnews.com/008527.html

Also see http://biochlorella.com/anticancer.html (less scientific -lacks concrete studies)

  • Spirulina:

Spirulina shown to prevent and treat cancers while boosting immune

http://www.naturalnews.com/008421_spirulina_cancer.html

Hypolipidemic, antioxidant, and antiinflammatory activities of Spirulina

science.naturalnews.com/…/1485679_Hypolipidemic_antioxidant_and_ antiinflammatory_activities_of_microalgae_Spirulina.html

science.naturalnews.com/…/916659_The_Effect_of_Ultrasonificated_ Extracts_of_Spirulina_maxima_on_the.html
science.naturalnews.com/…/843942_Enhancement_of_antitumor_natural_ killer_cell_activation_by_orally_administered.html
See also:

Chlorella and Spirulina Cancer Treatment

www.cancertutor.com/Cancer/Chlorella.html

articles.mercola.com/…/spirulina-the-amazing-super-food-youve-never-h…

Spirulina is Powerful Cancer Fighting Food – AlignLife

alignlife.com/articles/…/spirulina-is-powerful-cancer-fighting-food/

Spirulina vs. Cancer

  • Other Algae: Kombu, Kelp, other Brown Algae, etc.

See studies cited in FOOTER of articles below

http://www.livestrong.com › Food and Drink › Fruits and Vegetables › Seaweed

         FUCOIDAN – molecule in Brown Algae/Seaweed:

PubMed

Fucoidan is cited in over 800 studies found in PubMed database and these studies have proven many of fucoidan benefits.PubMed is a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine that includes over 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles back to the 1950s.

Science Direct

The world’s leading platform offers over 2,000 high quality peer-reviewed full-text journals and books on science, technology and medicine. ScienceDirect® is one of the largest online collections of published scientific research in the world.

Oxford Journal 

Fucoidan is cited in over 80 studies found in Oxford Journals database and these studies have proven many of fucoidan benefits.

NPO Fucoidan Research Lab, Japan

fucoidan cancer – PubMed Result

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?term=fucoidan%20cancer  

Fucoidan | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

http://www.mskcc.org/cancer-care/herb/fucoidan

Fucoidan – anti-cancer ingredient in seaweed – CANCERactive

www.canceractive.com/cancer-active-page-link.aspx?n=2887

Fucoidan studies

http://science.naturalnews.com/Fucoidan.html

Aug 1, 2013  Fucoidan induces apoptosis through activation of caspase-8 on human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry

http://science.naturalnews.com/Fucoidan_2.html

Aug 1, 2013  Fucoidan studies.  Regenerate and recharge with Fucoidan · Common Seaweed May Provide an Important Cancer Cure · Interview with 

Fucoidan present in brown algae induces apoptosis of human colon  http://science.naturalnews.com/…/1717022_Fucoidan_present_in_brown_algae_ induces_apoptosis_of_human_colon.html

Fucoidan present in brown algae induces apoptosis of human colon cancer cells. Publication: BMC gastroenterology. Publication Date: 2010. Study Author(s): 

Fucoidan induces apoptosis through activation of caspase 8 on  http://science.naturalnews.com/…/1720433_Fucoidan_induces_apoptosis_through_ activation_of_caspase_8_on_human.html

In the present report, we investigated the effect of Fucoidan on the induction of apoptosis in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Our data demonstrated that 

The mechanism of fucoidan induced apoptosis in leukemic cells http://science.naturalnews.com/…/1351426_The_mechanism_of_fucoidan_induced _apoptosis_in_leukemic_cells_involvement.html

The mechanism of fucoidan induced apoptosis in leukemic cells:  of Medicine and Medical Research Center for Cancer Molecular Therapy, Dong-A University,  

Radioprotective effects of fucoidan on bone marrow cells  http://science.naturalnews.com/…/2448859_Radioprotective_effects_of_fucoidan_ on_bone_marrow_cells_improvement_of.html

Radioprotective effects of fucoidan on bone marrow cells: improvement of the cell  Anti-Cancer Fucoidans Extracted from Brown Marine Algae; May be Used in 

And many others. Search google or go to http://science.naturalnews.com  and type “fucoidan cancer”.

  1. U-Fucoidan causes cancer cells to self-destruct. – NaturoDoc http://www.naturodoc.com/library/detox/U-Fucoidan.htm

Aloe Family( i.e. :Aloe Vera, Aloe Arborescens)

Oral administration of Aloe vera and honey reduces walker tumour  http://science.naturalnews.com/…/1969141_Oral_administration_of_Aloe_vera_ and_honey_reduces_walker_tumour.html

Research in cancer control has shown the importance of co-adjuvant therapies. aloe vera may reduce tumour mass and metastasis rates, while honey may

Immunomodulatory effects of Aloe vera and its fractions on response  http://science.naturalnews.com/…/2266539_Immunomodulatory_effects_of_Aloe_ vera_and_its_fractions_on_response.html

Immunomodulatory effects of Aloe vera and its fractions on response of  types of diseases. aloe vera has been shown to modulate the immune response.„Stimulating immune response to antigens (foreign elements in the body) is where Aloe Vera has shown the most promise in treating cancer. While no one yet proposes Aloe Vera as a cure for cancer, it is clear from research conducted throughout the world over the past thirty years as Aloe Vera and in particular, certain specific substances from plants – have very dramatic and impressive anti-cancer effects. Aloe Vera has been shown to enhance the immune response to cancer, promote the growth of new and healthy cells and reduce the overall viral load within the body thereby revitalizing the body in fighting cancer. „http://www.cancer-coverup.com/fighters/aloe-cancer.htm

„To maintain a healthy body, cells must” communicate „with each other. Their language is one of touch, written in carbohydrates (or simple sugars) on the cell surface. Like thousands of „keys” different projects on the cell surface, they either unlock the required functions of the adjacent cell or not. If the correct key is available, the body functions at smoothly. If not, it does NOT. „

Remember, over 90% of cancer ar due to cellular (inter)communication failure(read cancer causes)

“Aloe contains mannose, galactose and arabinose. The leaves are particularly rich in polysaccharides that provide healing and anti-infection properties when used both externally and internally. Aloe acts as an antifungal, antiviral, antibacterial, anti-allergy and antiinflammatory. It also protects the liver from chemical injury.” http://www.glyconutrientsreference.com/whatareglyconutrients/naturalsourcesofglyconutrients.php

In my book I described  a more pontent treatment based on a more powerful ALOE (ARBORESCENS), designed to :
1. supercharge the immune system quickly 2. it kills cancer cells safely 3.flood your body with super-nutrients (energy for healthy cells and glyconutrients ) .
4. detoxify
5. prevent cancer / help proper intercellular communication (over  90% of cancers are due to a failure of cellular communication). 

BetaGlucans

sources: in medicinal mushrooms:ABM, Reishi(Ganoderma) , Maitake,Shiitake, etc.

science.naturalnews.com/B/Beta-glucan_and_cancer.html
immunotherapy.
2009 Experimental and molecular pathology
Beta-glucan enhanced apoptosis in human colon cancer cells SNU-C4.
2009 Nutrition research and practiceYeast-derived Beta-glucan in combination with anti-tumor monoclonal antibody therapy in cancer.
2009 Recent patents on anti-cancer drug discovery

Yeast whole glucan particle (WGP) Beta-glucan in conjunction with antitumour monoclonal antibodies to treat cancer.
2005 Expert opinion on biological therapy

Therapeutic intervention with complement and Beta-glucan in cancer.
1999 Immunopharmacology

Orally administered particulate Beta-glucan modulates tumor-capturing dendritic cells and improves antitumor T-cell responses in cancer.
2010 Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association forcancer Research

Effect of yeast-derived Beta-glucan in conjunction with bevacizumab for the treatment of human lung adenocarcinoma in subcutaneous and orthotopic xenograft models.
2009 Journal of immunotherapy (Hagerstown, Md. : 1997)

Growth-inhibitory effects of a Beta-glucan from the mycelium of Poria cocos on human breast carcinoma MCF-7 cells: cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis induction.
2006 Oncology reports

Potentiating effect of beta-glucans on photodynamic therapy of implanted cancercells in mice.
2010 The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine

See this article on medicinal mushrooms.

Bee products( bee honey, bee pollen, bee propolis, bee  venom, royal jelly)

science.naturalnews.com/…/2129973_Bee_products_prevent_VEGF_induced _angiogenesis_in_human_umbilical_vein.html
Bee products prevent VEGF induced angiogenesis in human umbilical vein  is a key regulator of pathogenic angiogenesis in diseases such as cancer and 

Sonoran propolis: chemical composition and antiproliferative activity 

science.naturalnews.com/…/4062551_Sonoran_propolis_chemical_ composition_and_antiproliferative_activity_on_cancer_cell.html
science.naturalnews.com/…/346181_Bee_venom_inhibits_tumor_ angiogenesis_and_metastasis_by_inhibiting_tyrosine.html
Bee venom inhibits tumor angiogenesis and metastasis by inhibiting tyrosine phosphorylation of VEGFR 2 in LLC tumor bearing mice. Publication: Cancer 
science.naturalnews.com/…/2528278_Effect_of_royal_jelly_on_bisphenol_A _induced_proliferation_of.html
Studies show that royal jelly fights cancer, improves blood health, and more 

A steroid fraction of chloroform extract from bee pollen of Brassica 

science.naturalnews.com/…/3499272_A_steroid_fraction_of_chloroform_ extract_from_bee_pollen_of.html
A steroid fraction of chloroform extract from bee pollen of Brassica campestris induces apoptosis in human prostate cancer PC 3 cells.
science.naturalnews.com/…/2632768_Antineoplastic_Effects_of_Bee_Honey _and_Nigella_sativa_on_Hepatocellular.html
Antineoplastic Effects of Bee Honey and Nigella sativa on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells.
science.naturalnews.com/…/2055363_Ethanolic_Extract_of_Propolis_ Augments_TRAIL_Induced_Apoptotic_Death_in.html
science.naturalnews.com/…/3573150_Effects_of_ethanol_and_water_extracts _of_propolis_bee_glue.html
science.naturalnews.com/…/235810_Ethanolic_extract_of_Brazilian_green_ propolis_sensitizes_prostate_cancer_cells.html
Bee Propolis Stops Tumors from Neurofibromatosis and Cancer · Studies show that bee propolis prevents cancerboosts immunity, and more · Bee Propolis: 
science.naturalnews.com/…/2693928_The_effect_of_bee_propolis_on_ recurrent_aphthous_stomatitis_a.html
MANY STUDIES on BEE PROPOLIS and CANCER(published on PUBMED)

POWERFUL ANTI-TUMORAL treatments using honey and other BEE PRODUCTS described in my book !

<<PREVIOUS PAGE NEXT PAGE>>